Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Plea in Supreme Court Seeks Re-election in 20 Vidhan Sabha Seats in Haryana Due to EVM Discrepancies

Plea in Supreme Court Seeks Re-election in 20 Vidhan Sabha Seats in Haryana Due to EVM Discrepancies


Introduction

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court of India demanding re-election in 20 assembly constituencies in Haryana. The petition alleges suspicious election results and discrepancies in the functioning of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) used during the state legislative assembly elections in 2024. The plea, filed by petitioners Priya Mishra and Vikas Bansal, claims that irregularities in EVM battery levels and functioning compromised the integrity of the election process, calling for a fresh round of voting in the affected constituencies.


Details of the Petition

The petition, filed through advocate Narendra Mishra, calls for re-elections in the specified constituencies, citing inconsistencies in EVM operations. It alleges that certain EVMs used during the counting of votes on October 8, 2024, were operating at varying battery levels, ranging from 99% to 60-70%. This discrepancy in battery levels raised concerns regarding the accuracy of the voting process.


The petition further highlights that some of the EVMs at polling stations were found functioning at different battery capacities within the same polling station, leading to questions about whether these machines were compromised during the counting process. The petition argues that this variability in EVM performance casts doubt on the reliability of the election outcome and points to a possible malfunction in the machines.


Allegations of Electoral Malpractice

The petitioners allege that the discrepancies in battery levels are a clear sign of electoral malpractice. It argues that the lack of clarification from the Election Commission of India (ECI) about the inconsistent EVM battery levels is a matter of grave concern. The Indian National Congress (INC) also raised objections to the EVM malfunction during the election, presenting a complaint to the ECI. However, according to the petition, the majority of the complaints went unanswered by the returning officers.


The petition underscores that EVMs operating at 99% battery capacity on the day of the election results, while others at the same polling stations were functioning at significantly lower levels, is a suspicious anomaly that needs to be investigated. It also raises concerns over how some EVMs, despite being fully charged, were suspected of receiving additional power from an external, unverified source, which would be physically impossible under normal circumstances.


Call for Re-election in 20 Assembly Seats

The petition specifically calls for re-election in 20 Vidhan Sabha constituencies, where the questionable EVMs were used during the counting process. The petitioners argue that the discrepancy in battery levels, combined with the lack of response from the election authorities, raises serious doubts about the integrity of the results in these constituencies. Therefore, they seek a Supreme Court directive for fresh elections in these areas to ensure the democratic process is not undermined.


Issues Raised Regarding ECI Turnout Data

Another significant issue highlighted by the petition is the irregularities in voter turnout data published by the ECI during the election. The petition notes that the turnout percentages were inconsistent and increased dramatically over time. For example, the turnout data at 7:25 pm on October 5, 2024, indicated a 61.19% voter turnout. By 11:45 pm, the turnout had jumped to 65.65%, and by October 7, 2024, at 8:44 pm, the turnout reached an unexpected 67.90%.


The petition calls on the Supreme Court to direct the ECI to publish all three sets of turnout data along with Form 17C (the final form for capturing poll results) and store the EVM machines used during the election for further investigation. It also demands the publication of the election certificates and any other related electoral documentation.


Grounds for Filing the Petition

The petitioners have filed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, which empowers citizens to seek enforcement of their fundamental rights. They argue that the petition is necessary to protect the integrity of the democratic process and ensure free and fair elections in Haryana. The petition specifically refers to the protection of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, which guarantee equality before the law, freedom of expression, and the right to life and liberty.


Additionally, the petitioners invoke provisions of the Representation of People Act, 1951, specifically Section 123(3), which deals with corrupt electoral practices, and Rules 49S and 56C(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, which pertain to the handling of EVMs during elections.


Conclusion

The petition raises significant concerns about the accuracy and fairness of the election results in Haryana. The allegations of malfunctioning EVMs, coupled with the discrepancies in voter turnout data, call into question the legitimacy of the election process in 20 assembly constituencies. The Supreme Court’s intervention will be crucial in determining whether a re-election is warranted to uphold the sanctity of India’s democratic processes.


This case underscores the importance of electoral transparency and the role of the Election Commission of India in ensuring that the public can trust the election outcomes. It also highlights the need for greater accountability and scrutiny in the use of electronic voting technologies. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for future elections in India, particularly with respect to the use of EVMs and the handling of voter data.


---


This article delves into the specifics of the petition and highlights the concerns around electoral integrity and the use of technology in the voting process. The ongoing Supreme Court proceedings will provide a clearer picture of whether these discrepancies will lead to a re-election and the potential impact on the political landscape in Haryana.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more