Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Marital Rape: NGO Seeks Intervention in Supreme Court

Marital Rape: NGO Seeks Intervention in Supreme Court 


Introduction

The debate around marital rape continues to intensify as the Justice for Rights Foundation, a non-governmental organization, files an application in the Supreme Court of India. The NGO expresses concerns over the potential misuse of laws if marital rape were to be criminalized, arguing that existing legal provisions already protect women from abuse within marriage.


Concerns Over Legal Misuse

In their application, the NGO cites Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which has been widely criticized for its potential misuse. They argue that criminalizing marital rape could create an additional tool for malicious prosecution, which could have severe implications for innocent husbands. The application states:  

> "Accusations of rape carry a severe social stigma, and false allegations could irreparably harm the reputation and lives of innocent husbands."


Existing Protections

The Justice for Rights Foundation contends that there are already sufficient laws in place to protect women from atrocities within the marital home. They point to existing legislation, such as the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which offers both civil and criminal remedies for abuse, making the criminalization of marital rape unnecessary.


Sanctity of Marriage

The NGO emphasizes the need to maintain the sanctity of marriage, arguing that criminalizing marital rape could disrupt the privacy and intimacy that are essential to marital relationships. They argue that such a move could undermine existing mediation and reconciliation processes in marital disputes.


Call for Procedural Safeguards

If the Supreme Court decides to strike down the marital rape exception, the Justice for Rights Foundation requests that it issue guidelines to safeguard the interests of all parties involved. These guidelines could include measures to protect the identity of the accused, ensure compliance with arrest procedures, and promote mediation in cases of marital conflict.


The Petitioner’s Stand

The All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA) is also actively involved in this legal battle, challenging Exception 2 of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which currently protects husbands from prosecution in cases of forced sexual intercourse with their wives. During the hearing, Senior Advocate Karuna Nundy highlighted that this case is about “people versus patriarchy,” emphasizing the need for women’s autonomy within marriage.


The Center's Affidavit

The Indian government, in its recent affidavit, argued against the criminalization of marital rape, citing that it could severely impact conjugal relationships and disturb the institution of marriage. They emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to the issue rather than a purely legal one, cautioning that misuse of provisions could occur, complicating the ability to prove consent.


Conclusion

As the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding the marital rape exception, the tension between protecting women's rights and ensuring fair legal processes for all parties continues to shape the discourse. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for marital law and gender equality in India.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more