Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi Police Under Scrutiny for Delays in Lodging FIR in Kidnapping Case

Delhi Police Under Scrutiny for Delays in Lodging 

FIR in Kidnapping Case


The Delhi Police have come under criticism for delays in registering an FIR in a kidnapping case, where six months elapsed between the initial missing person report and the registration of an FIR. This matter, brought to light in a habeas corpus case pending before the Delhi High Court, highlights concerns over law enforcement’s efficiency in handling sensitive missing persons cases.


Case Background: Missing Boy in Bhajanpura


On January 10, 2024, a boy went missing from the Bhajanpura area of Delhi. Despite his mother’s repeated attempts to seek help, the police registered an FIR only on June 29, 2024, under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which pertains to kidnapping or abduction with intent to confine. Frustrated with the lack of progress, the mother, represented by Advocate Fozia Rahman, filed a habeas corpus petition in the Delhi High Court to expedite the search for her son.


Status Report and Investigation Delays


A division bench comprising Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma is hearing the case. The Delhi Police, in a status report filed before the High Court, stated that despite all possible efforts to locate the boy, they failed to gather concrete information in the initial months. After filing the FIR on June 29, 2024, the investigation was assigned to HC Sonu, followed by SI Kunal on July 3, 2024.


The delay in filing the FIR and assigning the case for investigation has raised questions regarding the police's procedures and prioritization of missing persons cases. 


Developments: Social Media and Digital Leads


Since the filing of the habeas corpus petition, the Delhi Police have filed multiple status reports. In September 2024, they informed the Court of new information indicating the missing boy might be using an Instagram account. Social media became a critical avenue for the investigation, as the police sought cooperation from various platforms to retrieve user data.


On September 6, 2024, investigators identified an Instagram user ID, @shabanashabana8032, suspected to be used by the missing boy. Subsequently, under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), police sent a notice to Meta Platforms Inc. (Instagram’s parent company), requesting access to account details, including phone number, IP address, and device information. However, Meta had not responded to this request as per the latest updates from the investigation officer.


Challenges with Social Media Cooperation


The Delhi Police’s reliance on social media to track the boy exposed challenges in law enforcement’s interaction with technology companies. Meta Platforms informed the Court that the requested data had been uploaded on a secure platform accessible to law enforcement. Standing Counsel Sanjay Lao confirmed receipt of this information, and the High Court subsequently directed the platforms to file their responses.


This aspect of the investigation brings forth larger issues of cooperation between law enforcement agencies and tech companies, especially in cases involving urgent humanitarian concerns like missing persons.


Court’s Observations and Recommendations


The Delhi High Court has noted its concerns regarding delays in locating missing persons. The Court referenced its own judgment from July 2024, emphasizing that the first 24 hours following a missing report are critical for locating a missing child or person. In the same judgment, the Court outlined that delays beyond this period significantly reduce the chances of safe recovery and may jeopardize an individual's safety.


Additionally, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has voiced its challenges in working with tech companies for cases involving urgent data requests. In a recent submission, the MHA’s Nodal Officer detailed the difficulties and offered suggestions to improve protocols for data exchange between law enforcement and social media platforms.


Call for Improved Protocols and Cooperation


This case has highlighted the need for streamlined processes and enhanced collaboration between law enforcement and social media companies to avoid delays in locating missing persons. It points to the importance of:

- Swift FIR registration following a missing person report

- Early use of digital tools and data from social media for investigation

- Improved response time from social media companies to law enforcement requests for user data


As more cases involve digital footprints, the effectiveness of cooperation between law enforcement agencies and tech companies becomes increasingly vital.


Conclusion


The delay in filing the FIR and subsequent challenges faced by the Delhi Police in this case underscore a need for enhanced coordination and efficiency in handling missing persons cases. For families in distress, delays not only add to their anguish but can also compromise the safety of their loved ones. This incident sheds light on systemic gaps in protocol and emphasizes the importance of swift response times to safeguard lives.

Location: Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more