Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over CBI’s Disturbing Findings in Kolkata Doctor’s Rape and Murder Case

Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over CBI’s Disturbing Findings in Kolkata Doctor’s Rape and Murder Case


In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India voiced its deep concern regarding the disturbing findings presented by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the ongoing investigation into the rape and murder of a doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, a state-run facility in Kolkata, West Bengal. The case, which the Supreme Court took up suo motu, has brought attention to severe discrepancies in the investigation, particularly in the handling of evidence and the overall probe process.


CBI’s Findings Raise Alarm in the Court


A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, expressed their dismay after reviewing the status report submitted by the CBI. The court stated that the findings in the report are "really disturbing," and echoed concerns raised by a lawyer regarding inconsistencies, such as issues with the seizure list.


The Court acknowledged the sensitive nature of the case and chose not to disclose specific details from the CBI report, citing the potential risk of jeopardizing the ongoing investigation. The court made it clear that the focus of the CBI should remain on unearthing the absolute truth, and assured that they are giving the investigative agency sufficient time to complete the probe.


Supreme Court Urges CBI to Include Victim’s Family in the Process


The Court also emphasized the importance of considering valuable inputs from the father of the victim. The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the CBI, assured the Court that the agency would continue to inform and remain in touch with the victim’s family during the investigation. The top court reiterated that this communication is essential to maintain transparency and provide justice.


Denial of Live Streaming Halt: Public Interest vs. Threats to Lawyers


During the proceedings, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the State of West Bengal, raised concerns regarding the live streaming of the case. He noted that the streaming was leading to public backlash, with lawyers receiving threats on social media platforms. Sibal pointed out that female staff in his chambers were being threatened with acid attacks and rape, raising serious concerns about the safety of legal professionals involved in the case.


However, the Court declined to stop the live streaming, stating that the case is of public interest and must be transparent. The Court assured that it would intervene if any threats were made against lawyers or others involved in the case, emphasizing that no one should be subject to such intimidation.


Supreme Court Stresses on Equal Opportunities for Women Doctors


In a significant remark, the Supreme Court highlighted the importance of equal opportunities for women, particularly in light of a West Bengal Government notification that temporarily barred women doctors from working night shifts or beyond 12 hours. The notification was part of recent security measures following the tragic incident at RG Kar Medical College.


However, the Court, while hearing the suo motu petition, stated that women doctors do not seek concessions but equal opportunities and that they are willing to work in all conditions. The Bench asserted that the state’s duty is to provide safety for women professionals, not to restrict their work. The West Bengal government, represented by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, assured the Court that the restriction would be removed, and no punitive action would be taken against doctors returning to work.


Supreme Court Condemns Political Submissions


The Supreme Court also expressed its displeasure at an application seeking the resignation of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. The Court sternly reminded the lawyer submitting the application that the courtroom is not a political forum, and warned him to abide by the rules of legal discipline. The Bench made it clear that the Court is focused on legal matters, not personal opinions about political functionaries.


Protection of Victim’s Identity: Wikipedia Ordered to Comply


In another significant development, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Court that the name and photograph of the victim had appeared on Wikipedia, violating the principles of non-disclosure of rape victim identities. The Court promptly directed Wikipedia to comply with its previous orders and remove any content that could reveal the victim’s identity, reinforcing the legal requirement to maintain the dignity and privacy of the victim.


Conclusion


The Supreme Court’s intervention in the RG Kar Medical College rape and murder case underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for a thorough and transparent investigation. The Court’s insistence on equal opportunities for women doctors, its emphasis on the CBI’s duty to unearth the truth, and its strong stance against political misuse of the legal process reflect its commitment to delivering justice while maintaining legal integrity. 


As the CBI continues its investigation, the Court will remain vigilant in ensuring that the process remains fair, with inputs from the victim’s family and a close watch on any developments that could affect the outcome of the case.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more