Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Guidelines on Child Safety and Security in Schools Across States and Union Territories

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Guidelines

 on Child Safety and Security in Schools Across 

States and Union Territories


In a significant ruling on child safety, the Supreme Court of India has directed all states and union territories to implement the Centre’s guidelines on the safety and security of children in schools. The court also tasked the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) with coordinating and monitoring the implementation of these guidelines.


Supreme Court’s Direction on Child Safety


A bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh noted that the Centre had already notified the guidelines on child safety and directed the union government to ensure that copies of the guidelines are sent to chief secretaries or their equivalent officers in each state and union territory. 


The NCPCR was entrusted with coordinating with state governments and seeking status reports on the implementation of these guidelines, ensuring that children's safety in educational institutions is a top priority.


Recent Incidents Highlight the Need for Safety


This directive comes in the wake of recent tragic incidents, including the Badlapur case in Maharashtra, where two schoolgirls were sexually assaulted by a school staff member. The incident served as a grim reminder of the gaps in school safety measures. An NGO, Bachpan Bachao Andolan, filed an application following the Badlapur incident, seeking the implementation of the Centre’s guidelines on the safety and security of children in schools nationwide.


Advocacy for Children's Safety by Bachpan Bachao Andolan


Representing the NGO, senior advocate HS Phoolka pointed out that only five states have implemented the guidelines, leaving a significant gap in child protection measures in the remaining states and union territories. The ongoing petition, originally filed on May 6, 2019, called for the notification and implementation of these guidelines to safeguard children from sexual abuse and assault in educational institutions.


The Bachpan Bachao Andolan raised concerns over how the failure of state and UT governments to notify the guidelines has compromised the safety of children, particularly in government, government-aided, and private schools. The guidelines, developed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) in consultation with the NCPCR, were designed to hold school management accountable for ensuring the safety of students.


Guidelines for Fixing Accountability


The NGO’s petition emphasized that the August 2018 guidelines were a critical tool in fixing accountability for school management concerning student safety. The petition claimed that if these guidelines had been implemented, incidents like the one in Badlapur could have been prevented.


The Supreme Court's directive has now intensified the urgency to notify and enforce these guidelines, including the 2021 Guidelines on School Safety and Security, which were developed by the Department of School Education and Literacy in compliance with earlier court orders.


Plea for Mandatory Notification of Guidelines


The petition filed in December 2022 also sought a mandate for all states and union territories to immediately notify and implement the guidelines on school safety. The application raised concerns over the recurring failure of school management to protect children, highlighting that recent incidents underscored the vulnerability of children in educational settings.


Conclusion


The Supreme Court’s intervention is a pivotal step in ensuring that the safety and security of children in schools is no longer compromised. By holding schools accountable and pushing for the strict implementation of safety guidelines, the ruling aims to create a safer environment for children across India.


This ruling serves as a strong reminder that the protection of children must be prioritized, and all states and union territories must work in coordination with the NCPCR to ensure that schools are safe havens for children.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more