Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Supreme Court Decision: V. Senthil Balaji vs The Directorate of Enforcement

Supreme Court Decision: V. Senthil Balaji vs 

The Directorate of Enforcement



Background and Case Summary

The case under discussion is Criminal Appeal No. 4011 of 2024, which arose from Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3986 of 2024. V. Senthil Balaji, a former Transport Minister in Tamil Nadu (2011-2016), was accused of involvement in a significant job racketeering scheme. The charges against him primarily relate to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.


Allegations

The allegations stem from several FIRs filed between 2015 and 2018, which accuse Balaji of promising jobs in the Transport Department in exchange for money. It was claimed that Balaji, along with his associates, collected large sums of money for posts like drivers, conductors, junior tradesmen, and engineers. Over 2,000 individuals were named as accused, and multiple chargesheets were filed under sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and the PMLA.


The Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) based on these allegations and arrested Balaji in June 2023, accusing him of laundering money through various illegal schemes.


Grounds for Bail Rejection

Balaji’s bail application was originally rejected by the Madras High Court, leading to this appeal. His defense contended that:

- The ED’s case was built on evidence collected by other investigating agencies.

- Incriminating documents were allegedly found on a pen drive during a search at his premises. However, forensic analysis indicated discrepancies, as a key file (CS AC) was missing.

- The money in question (Rs. 1.34 crores) was claimed to be his legitimate income as an MLA and from agriculture.


Despite these arguments, the prosecution highlighted serious discrepancies in the defense's claims, citing that Balaji’s salary as an MLA was deposited directly into his bank account and that his agricultural income could not account for the large cash deposits. Further, the ED presented extensive evidence of money laundering activities, including seized electronic records and large unexplained cash transactions.


Court’s Consideration

The Supreme Court, after reviewing the arguments, outlined several key aspects:

1. Incriminating Evidence: The court acknowledged that prima facie evidence, including forensic and electronic data, pointed to Balaji's involvement in the laundering of Rs. 67.74 crores.

2. Proceeds of Crime: The PMLA case is tied directly to scheduled offenses under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. These predicate offenses form the foundation of the laundering charges.

3. Complexity and Delay: The sheer scale of the case, with over 2,000 accused and 600 witnesses, led the court to observe that the trial would take several years to conclude. The delay in starting the trials for the scheduled offenses was also a significant concern, as it would likely prolong the money laundering trial.


Right to Bail and Liberty

Balaji had been incarcerated for over 15 months, and considering the delays in the trial process, the court stressed the importance of the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. This led the court to conclude that denying bail indefinitely would infringe upon this right. The court also drew upon similar cases, including Manish Sisodia vs Directorate of Enforcement and K.A. Najeeb vs Union of India, to highlight that long periods of pre-trial incarceration without a timely trial violated fundamental rights.


Bail Conditions

The court granted bail to Balaji but imposed stringent conditions to prevent him from influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence. These conditions include:

- Furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,00,000 with two sureties.

- Regularly marking attendance with the Directorate of Enforcement and not contacting prosecution witnesses.

- Surrendering his passport to the court and appearing before both the Special Court and the court handling the scheduled offenses.


Conclusion

While Balaji was granted bail, the Supreme Court’s decision emphasizes the balance between the gravity of offenses under the PMLA and the fundamental rights of the accused. The case underscores the challenges in handling complex white-collar crimes, where prolonged trials can result in significant pre-trial detentions. The court’s ruling highlighted the importance of timely trials, especially in cases involving stringent laws like the PMLA.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more