Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan Challenges Arrest: Claims Unprecedented Assault on Fundamental Rights

AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan Challenges Arrest: Claims Unprecedented Assault on Fundamental Rights



Amanatullah Khan, a prominent Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA from Okhla, has approached the Delhi High Court, challenging his recent arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). In his petition, Khan argues that his arrest not only violates his fundamental rights but also represents a misuse of legal powers for political motives. He terms his arrest as an “unprecedented assault” on the basic rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution.


Allegations and Arrest


Khan was arrested in connection with a money laundering case related to alleged irregularities during his tenure as the Chairperson of the Delhi Waqf Board. The case also involves the acquisition of a Rs 36 crore property in Okhla. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has been investigating Khan's financial dealings as part of its broader scrutiny into alleged financial mismanagement and disproportionate assets during his time as the Waqf Board chairperson.


The ED’s arrest of Khan stems from two separate First Information Reports (FIRs) filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) of Delhi. The CBI’s FIR focuses on irregularities in appointments made by Khan at the Delhi Waqf Board, while the ACB’s FIR concerns a disproportionate assets case linked to his tenure as the chairperson.


Khan’s Plea: An Unjust Arrest


In his plea to the Delhi High Court, Khan contends that his arrest is unjust and illegal, claiming that it was politically motivated to harass and persecute him. He accuses the ED of applying the letter of the law while ignoring its spirit, calling his detention a “classic case” of misuse of legal provisions.


Khan’s plea further highlights the following:

1. No Cooperation Isn’t a Crime: He asserts that his arrest is based on the ED’s claim of non-cooperation during interrogation. According to him, his right to remain silent and refusal to provide a self-incriminating statement does not justify detention.

2. Lack of Evidence: He argues that the ED has failed to provide any conclusive evidence linking him to the proceeds of crime, which is an essential condition for proving an offense under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). 

3. Proceeds of Crime: Khan contends that the ED has not demonstrated any involvement in the placement, layering, or integration of illegal funds, which are necessary components to establish a money laundering offense under PMLA.


Alleged Misuse of Waqf Board Authority


As the former chairperson of the Delhi Waqf Board, Amanatullah Khan has been accused of financial mismanagement and irregular appointments. Waqf boards are entrusted with managing religious properties and ensuring that their income is used for charitable purposes. However, during his tenure, allegations arose that Khan misused his position for personal gain, including the purchase of high-value properties and appointment irregularities.


Khan’s involvement in a Rs 36 crore property deal in Okhla has been one of the key areas of investigation for the ED. The agency is scrutinizing whether this acquisition, along with other financial dealings, was made using illicit funds or violated any waqf property regulations.


Legal Defense: Constitutional and Human Rights Violations


Khan's legal team has framed his arrest as a violation of his constitutional rights under the basic structure of the Indian Constitution, arguing that his fundamental rights were ignored during the arrest process. Specifically, Khan’s petition emphasizes:

- Right to Liberty: Khan claims that the ED violated his right to liberty by arresting him without sufficient legal grounds, especially when the ED did not present concrete evidence of any proceeds of crime.

- Vengeance and Political Motive: He argues that his arrest was politically motivated and aimed at tarnishing his reputation as a public representative, thereby constituting an assault on his fundamental and human rights.


Khan is seeking the Delhi High Court’s intervention to nullify the arrest, citing extraordinary writ jurisdiction to address the breach of his fundamental rights. He asserts that legal procedure was violated, and the arrest constitutes abuse of power by the ED.


ED's Investigation and Future Course


The Enforcement Directorate continues its investigation into Khan’s financial activities, with raids conducted on properties connected to him. A supplementary charge sheet is expected to be filed soon, which will include further allegations and evidence uncovered by the ED.


Meanwhile, Khan remains in judicial custody in Tihar Jail, where he has been held since his arrest. The ED has been interrogating him regarding financial transactions linked to the Delhi Waqf Board and other allegations of money laundering.


Misuse of Waqf Resources: An Ongoing Concern


The misuse of waqf properties has been a long-standing issue across India, with allegations of embezzlement, mismanagement, and illegal property transactions frequently surfacing in several states. Waqf boards are responsible for preserving properties donated for religious and charitable purposes, but allegations of misuse often arise when board members exploit their authority for personal or political gain.


In the case of Khan, the alleged misuse includes irregular appointments made at the Delhi Waqf Board and the acquisition of high-value properties under questionable circumstances. Such actions, if proven, undermine the integrity of waqf management and harm the communities these resources are meant to serve.


Conclusion


As Amanatullah Khan awaits the outcome of his petition in the Delhi High Court, the case raises broader questions about the misuse of public office and waqf resources. While Khan has framed his arrest as a violation of fundamental rights, the Enforcement Directorate is focused on investigating the allegations of financial irregularities and money laundering.


The High Court’s decision will not only determine Khan’s fate but could also set a precedent for how public officials are held accountable for mismanagement of public and religious resources. 

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more