Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

SC Reiterates Bail as the Rule, Jail as the Exception

SC Reiterates Bail as the Rule, Jail as the Exception



The Supreme Court of India has once again underscored the principle that bail should be the rule, and jail the exception. This reiteration came in a recent ruling where the apex court granted bail to an accused, Prem Prakash, in a money laundering case. The court emphasized the importance of not using statements given by an accused under custody as admissible evidence, especially when such statements are made under duress or coercion. 


Inadmissibility of Statements Under PMLA Custody


The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan ruled that any statement made by an accused under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) while in custody is inadmissible. The court stressed that an accused in custody cannot be considered to be acting with a free mind, and any statement made under such circumstances could be unsafe and unjust to be used against them. This ruling came in the context of Prem Prakash, who had been in custody for a different Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and was accused of fraudulently acquiring land.


Case Background: Prem Prakash's Bail


Prem Prakash had been in custody since August 2022 under a different ECIR when he was taken into custody again by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on August 11, 2023, for a separate money laundering case. The Jharkhand High Court had earlier dismissed his bail application on March 22, 2024. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, ruling that using a statement made under custody in a separate case would be a travesty of justice.


Fundamental Right to Liberty


In another landmark ruling, the Supreme Court granted bail to BRS leader K. Kavitha, emphasizing the superiority of the fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution over statutory restrictions. The court reiterated that prolonged incarceration before a person is found guilty should not be allowed to become a punishment in itself. 


Proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA


The Supreme Court also addressed the proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA, which entitles women to special consideration when applying for bail. The court criticized the Delhi High Court for denying this benefit to K. Kavitha, stating that the High Court had misinterpreted the law. The apex court clarified that the benefit of the proviso is not limited to vulnerable women but should be extended to all women, irrespective of their social or educational status.


The Court’s Caution on Educated and Well-Placed Women


The Supreme Court also cautioned that educated and well-placed women, who may inadvertently engage in illegal activities, should be treated with judicial prudence. The court emphasized the need for sensitivity and sympathy towards women and other vulnerable groups who might be misused or made scapegoats in criminal activities.


Judicial Discretion and Prudence


In conclusion, the Supreme Court's rulings highlight the importance of judicial discretion and prudence, especially when dealing with cases involving prolonged incarceration, the use of statements made under custody, and the rights of vulnerable groups. The court's emphasis on bail as the rule and jail as the exception serves as a reminder of the fundamental principles of justice and liberty enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more