Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Muslim Scholars and Clerics Demand Clarity from Secular Parties on Waqf (Amendment) Bill

Muslim Scholars and Clerics Demand Clarity from 

Secular Parties on Waqf (Amendment) Bill


In a critical political move, Muslim scholars, clerics, and intellectuals have called upon "secular political parties" to clarify their stance on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which has recently been referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee. This demand arises ahead of key Assembly elections in states such as Jammu & Kashmir, Haryana, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand, marking the first major elections since the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.


Concerns Over the Waqf (Amendment) Bill


The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, once passed, will be known as the United Waqf Act Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act (UMEED). The Muslim community has expressed significant concerns over this bill, particularly regarding the potential reduction of power for Waqf Boards. A meeting at Islam Gymkhana, hosted by Tareek-e-Awkaf and the All India Ulema Board, saw key figures such as Shabbir Ansari, Yusuf Abrahani, Baba Siddiqui, and others voicing their opposition.


The community appreciated Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Uddhav Thackeray's criticism of the bill and questioned the timing of its introduction by the BJP-led government. The bill is seen as politically motivated and a potential interference in religious matters.


Key Amendments in the Bill


The Waqf (Amendment) Bill proposes over 40 amendments, including the mandatory verification of all Waqf property claims, revisions to Sections 9 and 14 concerning the composition and functioning of Waqf Boards, and the introduction of women representatives. Additionally, the bill seeks to include members from various Muslim communities like Shia, Sunni, Bohra, and Aghakhani in the Waqf Boards.


The bill aims to address concerns about the arbitrary powers of the Waqf Boards, which have led to disputes and claims of misuse of extensive land deemed as Waqf properties.


Legal Context and Supreme Court Ruling


The Supreme Court, in April 2023, dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Act, filed by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay. The court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant, ruled that the constitutionality of a law cannot be challenged in the abstract and that the court cannot mandate Parliament to pass a law. The bench also dismissed the PIL, stating that Upadhyay failed to show any violation of his rights under the Waqf Act.


Final Thoughts


As the debate over the Waqf (Amendment) Bill continues, Muslim communities are calling for transparency and clarity from political parties on their stance. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact the upcoming state elections and the future management of Waqf properties in India.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more