Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Muslim Scholars and Clerics Demand Clarity from Secular Parties on Waqf (Amendment) Bill

Muslim Scholars and Clerics Demand Clarity from 

Secular Parties on Waqf (Amendment) Bill


In a critical political move, Muslim scholars, clerics, and intellectuals have called upon "secular political parties" to clarify their stance on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which has recently been referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee. This demand arises ahead of key Assembly elections in states such as Jammu & Kashmir, Haryana, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand, marking the first major elections since the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.


Concerns Over the Waqf (Amendment) Bill


The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, once passed, will be known as the United Waqf Act Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act (UMEED). The Muslim community has expressed significant concerns over this bill, particularly regarding the potential reduction of power for Waqf Boards. A meeting at Islam Gymkhana, hosted by Tareek-e-Awkaf and the All India Ulema Board, saw key figures such as Shabbir Ansari, Yusuf Abrahani, Baba Siddiqui, and others voicing their opposition.


The community appreciated Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Uddhav Thackeray's criticism of the bill and questioned the timing of its introduction by the BJP-led government. The bill is seen as politically motivated and a potential interference in religious matters.


Key Amendments in the Bill


The Waqf (Amendment) Bill proposes over 40 amendments, including the mandatory verification of all Waqf property claims, revisions to Sections 9 and 14 concerning the composition and functioning of Waqf Boards, and the introduction of women representatives. Additionally, the bill seeks to include members from various Muslim communities like Shia, Sunni, Bohra, and Aghakhani in the Waqf Boards.


The bill aims to address concerns about the arbitrary powers of the Waqf Boards, which have led to disputes and claims of misuse of extensive land deemed as Waqf properties.


Legal Context and Supreme Court Ruling


The Supreme Court, in April 2023, dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Act, filed by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay. The court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant, ruled that the constitutionality of a law cannot be challenged in the abstract and that the court cannot mandate Parliament to pass a law. The bench also dismissed the PIL, stating that Upadhyay failed to show any violation of his rights under the Waqf Act.


Final Thoughts


As the debate over the Waqf (Amendment) Bill continues, Muslim communities are calling for transparency and clarity from political parties on their stance. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact the upcoming state elections and the future management of Waqf properties in India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law