Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi HC Judge Recuses from Hearing Sukesh Chandrashekhar's Plea

Delhi HC Judge Recuses from Hearing 

Sukesh Chandrashekhar's Plea


Recusal by Justice Subramonium Prasad


On Wednesday, Delhi High Court's Justice Subramonium Prasad recused himself from hearing a plea filed by Sukesh Chandrashekhar, the alleged conman, who sought permission for increased meetings with his legal counsel. The recusal is attributed to the complex nature of Chandrashekhar's multiple legal cases, which could potentially create a conflict of interest or necessitate a different judicial perspective.


Plea for Increased Legal Consultations


Chandrashekhar's plea requested an increase in the number of meetings with his lawyers from two to five times a week. His legal team argued that the current limit of virtual meetings was insufficient for managing his defense effectively, given the complexity of his legal issues, which include high-profile corruption and extortion cases.


Chandrashekhar's request cited a precedent involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who was granted five weekly meetings with his legal counsel. Chandrashekhar's legal representative, Advocate Anant Malik, highlighted the petitioner’s need for more frequent consultations due to the extensive and intricate nature of his cases.


Personal and Constitutional Concerns


The petition also addressed Chandrashekhar's personal difficulties, including isolation from his family and the incarceration of his spouse. These factors have increased his distress and underscored the need for regular, meaningful interactions with his legal team.


Chandrashekhar argued that the current restrictions on legal consultations infringe upon his fundamental rights under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of one’s choice.


Background on Sukesh Chandrashekhar


Chandrashekhar is currently jailed for allegedly extorting Rs 200 crore from Aditi Singh, the wife of former Fortis promoter Shivinder Singh, under the pretense of securing bail for her husband. His extensive legal battles and high-profile nature of the case have further complicated his situation.


Next Steps


With Justice Prasad recusing himself, the case will now await reassignment to another judge, who will review Chandrashekhar's plea for additional legal consultations.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more