Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Delhi HC Judge Recuses from Hearing Sukesh Chandrashekhar's Plea

Delhi HC Judge Recuses from Hearing 

Sukesh Chandrashekhar's Plea


Recusal by Justice Subramonium Prasad


On Wednesday, Delhi High Court's Justice Subramonium Prasad recused himself from hearing a plea filed by Sukesh Chandrashekhar, the alleged conman, who sought permission for increased meetings with his legal counsel. The recusal is attributed to the complex nature of Chandrashekhar's multiple legal cases, which could potentially create a conflict of interest or necessitate a different judicial perspective.


Plea for Increased Legal Consultations


Chandrashekhar's plea requested an increase in the number of meetings with his lawyers from two to five times a week. His legal team argued that the current limit of virtual meetings was insufficient for managing his defense effectively, given the complexity of his legal issues, which include high-profile corruption and extortion cases.


Chandrashekhar's request cited a precedent involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who was granted five weekly meetings with his legal counsel. Chandrashekhar's legal representative, Advocate Anant Malik, highlighted the petitioner’s need for more frequent consultations due to the extensive and intricate nature of his cases.


Personal and Constitutional Concerns


The petition also addressed Chandrashekhar's personal difficulties, including isolation from his family and the incarceration of his spouse. These factors have increased his distress and underscored the need for regular, meaningful interactions with his legal team.


Chandrashekhar argued that the current restrictions on legal consultations infringe upon his fundamental rights under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of one’s choice.


Background on Sukesh Chandrashekhar


Chandrashekhar is currently jailed for allegedly extorting Rs 200 crore from Aditi Singh, the wife of former Fortis promoter Shivinder Singh, under the pretense of securing bail for her husband. His extensive legal battles and high-profile nature of the case have further complicated his situation.


Next Steps


With Justice Prasad recusing himself, the case will now await reassignment to another judge, who will review Chandrashekhar's plea for additional legal consultations.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more