Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Delhi HC Convicts Advocate for Contempt: A Serious Breach of Court Decorum

๐Ÿšจ Delhi HC Convicts Advocate for Contempt: A Serious

 Breach of Court Decorum ⚖️



In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court recently convicted advocate Sanjay Rathod of criminal contempt of court after he used abusive and filthy language against a magistrate at the Karkardooma Court while appearing in an inebriated state. This incident, which occurred on October 30, 2015, highlights the serious consequences of disrespecting the judiciary.


๐Ÿ›‘ Courtroom Misconduct: A Breach of Justice

A division bench of Justices Prathiba M Singh and Amit Sharma found Rathod guilty of criminal contempt, emphasizing that his actions scandalized the court and interfered with the administration of justice. The language used was not only foul but also directed towards a lady judicial officer, making it particularly reprehensible. The court stated that appearing in a drunken state is "unpardonable" and constitutes contempt on the face of the court.


⚖️ Consequences & Sentencing

While the High Court held Rathod guilty, it refrained from imposing an additional sentence as he had already served five months in custody related to a connected FIR. The court concluded that the time already served would be considered sufficient punishment for the criminal contempt.


๐Ÿ” The Incident: A Breakdown of Court Decorum

On the day of the incident, Rathod, representing a vehicle owner, began shouting and using abusive language in court after being informed of an adjournment. The magistrate reported the incident to the High Court, leading to the initiation of suo moto contempt proceedings against Rathod. Advocate Vrinda Grover was appointed as amicus curiae to assist the court in this matter.


๐Ÿ’ก Understanding Contempt of Court: Why It Matters

Contempt of court refers to actions that disrespect the authority or dignity of the court, potentially disrupting the judicial process. The Contempt of Courts Act defines criminal contempt as any act that scandalizes the court or interferes with the administration of justice. Upholding the respect and authority of the judiciary is crucial to maintaining public confidence in the legal system.


๐Ÿ‘ฉ‍⚖️ What is an Amicus Curiae?

The term "amicus curiae" means "friend of the court." It refers to an impartial advisor, often a legal expert, appointed to assist the court in making informed decisions, particularly in complex or sensitive cases.


The Delhi High Court's ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in courtrooms, as well as the serious repercussions of failing to do so.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more