Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Hindu Front Moves Plea in SC to Vacate Interim Stay in Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque Dispute

Hindu Front Moves Plea in SC to Vacate Interim Stay

in Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque Dispute


The Hindu Front for Justice (HFJ) has recently filed a plea in the Supreme Court of India to vacate the interim stay that restrains action based on the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report concerning the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque complex dispute.


Background of the Dispute


This complex issue began when the Madhya Pradesh High Court permitted an ASI survey of the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque to determine its religious character on March 11, 2024. Subsequently, the mosque committee challenged this decision, leading to the Supreme Court issuing an interim stay on April 1, 2024, preventing action based on the ASI's findings.


The Plea by HFJ


Filed through advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, HFJ's application argues that the Supreme Court's interim stay has rendered the Special Leave Petition (SLP) ineffective. HFJ maintains that objections to the ASI report can be raised in the High Court, where all related questions, including the locus standi and maintainability of the Writ Petition, should be addressed.


Implications of the Interim Stay


HFJ contends that the Supreme Court's refusal to stay the ASI survey, while simultaneously restraining action based on its report, has effectively stalled proceedings before the High Court. They argue that the questions raised in the Writ Petition need to be decided on their merits promptly, necessitating the vacation of the interim order.


Recent Developments


Earlier this week, the Supreme Court agreed to consider listing the petition related to the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque complex dispute. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain informed the Supreme Court that the ASI had submitted its report to the Madhya Pradesh High Court.


The High Court had earlier ordered the ASI to conduct a comprehensive survey without altering the original nature of the complex to ascertain its true character. This report was to be submitted within six weeks of the order's receipt.


High Court's Directives


The High Court has emphasized that the right to worship and perform rituals at the disputed site will only be considered after receiving the ASI's report. Issues such as the validity of the waqf on the disputed complex and the relief sought by the petitioners will also be adjudicated based on the ASI's findings.


Conclusion


HFJ's plea to vacate the interim stay aims to expedite the resolution of the complex dispute over the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque by allowing the High Court to proceed with the case. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter will be crucial in determining the future course of action.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more