Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi High Court Refuses to Stay Release of Netflix Series 'Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper'

Delhi High Court Refuses to Stay Release of Netflix Series 'Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper'



The Delhi High Court has refused to halt the release of the Netflix web series Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper. This decision came after a plea from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and other plaintiffs, who argued that the show's trailer depicted the chartered accountancy profession in a derogatory manner.


Court's Decision and Rationale


In a recent order, Justice Navin Chawla stated, "In my prima facie view, I do not find the trailer to be referring to the profession of chartered accounting in any manner." The court noted that the series appears to be a comedy and that it merely describes the main character as a topper in the Chartered Accountancy Examination. The judge emphasized that the content is not intended, nor can it be perceived, to be derogatory to the profession of Chartered Accountancy or to the examination's toppers or rank holders. The court also highlighted the importance of artistic expression, stating that it cannot be curtailed based on an overly sensitive interpretation.


Legal Proceedings and Plaintiff's Arguments


Despite refusing to stay the series' release, the court issued notices to all defendants and directed them to file their replies within four weeks. The plaintiffs, including the ICAI, contended that the trailer, released on July 10, 2024, portrays the chartered accountancy profession in a vulgar and derogatory manner. They argued that this portrayal is illegal and violates their constitutional rights.


The plaintiffs pointed to specific lines in the trailer that allegedly equate the services of Chartered Accountants to "debit and credit with reference to sexual services offered," which they claim is defamatory to the profession. They also mentioned receiving emails objecting to the trailer's content, which they said included unwarranted innuendos about the profession.


Defense by Netflix


Counsel for Netflix and other defendants argued that the series is entirely fictional and includes a disclaimer stating that it bears no reference to any real individual or profession. They also mentioned that, within five days, Netflix would add a disclaimer specifically noting that the series does not refer to any profession, further mitigating the concerns raised by the plaintiffs.


Conclusion


This case underscores the ongoing debate over the boundaries of artistic expression and the protection of professional reputations. The court's decision highlights the importance of balancing creative freedom with respect for professions and individuals. As the legal proceedings continue, the case may set a precedent for how such issues are handled in the future.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more