Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi High Court Allows Termination of 32-Week Pregnancy Due to Foetal Abnormality

Delhi High Court Allows Termination of 32-Week Pregnancy 

Due to Foetal Abnormality



The Delhi High Court has granted permission to a married woman to medically terminate her 32-week pregnancy due to significant abnormalities in the foetus. The decision was made after considering recommendations from the AIIMS Medical Board and the well-being of the petitioner.


Court's Decision and Reasoning


Justice Sanjeev Narula, in his order dated July 13, highlighted that continuing the pregnancy posed a significant risk to the petitioner’s physical and mental health and was likely to result in the birth of a child with severe health issues. Therefore, the court found it appropriate to allow the termination in the best interests of both the petitioner and the unborn child.


AIIMS Medical Board's Evaluation


The AIIMS Medical Board had thoroughly evaluated the case, counseling the petitioner and her husband about the procedure and risks involved in such a late-term termination. The petitioner confirmed her understanding and willingness to proceed with the termination after receiving the medical opinion.


Legal Framework: The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act


The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, governs the conditions under which a pregnancy may be terminated. Section 3(2B) of the MTP Act permits a woman to seek termination beyond the 24-week gestational limit if substantial foetal abnormalities are detected. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare's guidelines, issued on August 14, 2017, support this provision for late-term terminations referred by a court of law.


Court's Considerations


The High Court referred to the guidelines that classify abnormalities like 'Corpus callosum agenesis with additional major abnormalities' and 'Hydrocephalus over 20mm with dilation of all ventricles' as major central nervous system abnormalities. Given the medical report's clear indication of substantial foetal abnormalities, the court was inclined to accept the petitioner’s request.


Additionally, the court acknowledged the importance of the mother’s choice and the potential for a dignified life for the unborn child, aligning with the scheme of the MTP Act, especially Section 3(3).


Background of the Case


The petitioner, a 31-year-old married woman, approached the Delhi High Court for permission to terminate her 32-week pregnancy after discovering significant foetal abnormalities through an ultrasound on July 4. Her counsel, Amit Mishra, presented results from four different labs, all confirming the abnormalities. Given the advanced stage of pregnancy, the court sought a detailed report from AIIMS, which supported the termination due to the detected abnormalities.


Why High Court Permission Was Needed


Under the MTP Act, termination beyond 24 weeks requires court approval if substantial foetal abnormalities are present. This ensures that all legal and medical aspects are thoroughly considered, protecting the health and rights of the mother while adhering to the law.


Conclusion


The Delhi High Court's decision underscores the importance of legal and medical frameworks in addressing complex pregnancy-related issues. It emphasizes the need to balance the mother's health and well-being with legal guidelines, ensuring compassionate and just outcomes.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more