Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Anjali Birla Files Defamation Suit in Delhi High Court Over Alleged False Claims on Social Media

Anjali Birla Files Defamation Suit in Delhi High Court

Over Alleged False Claims on Social Media



Anjali Birla, an Indian Railway Personnel Service (IRPS) officer and daughter of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, has filed a defamation suit in the Delhi High Court. The suit aims to remove defamatory social media posts alleging that she cleared the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) exams on her first attempt due to her father's influence.


False Allegations and Defamation Claims


In her legal filing, Anjali Birla asserts that several social media posts are disseminating misleading and false information about her, which she claims are defamatory. The posts allegedly suggest that her successful clearing of the UPSC exams was influenced by her father’s political standing, rather than merit. Anjali contends that these allegations are not only baseless but are also intended to unlawfully tarnish her reputation and professional standing.


Court Proceedings


Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi High Court has agreed to hear the matter, following a request for an urgent listing made by Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, who is representing Anjali Birla. The suit names several defendants, including the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Google Inc, X Corp (formerly Twitter), and John Doe, which refers to unknown parties involved in disseminating the defamatory content.


Allegations of Targeting and Reputation Damage


The suit claims that individuals behind these social media posts aim to damage Anjali Birla's professional reputation without any factual basis, potentially to create controversies against the current government and specifically target her. The lawsuit also seeks to protect the reputation of her family members, including her father, Om Birla, the Hon'ble Speaker of the 18th Lok Sabha of India.


Legal Actions and Complaints


Anjali Birla, through a representative, has filed a complaint with the Inspector General of Police, Cyber Cell, Maharashtra. The complaint targets several Twitter account holders and other individuals, known and unknown, for committing offenses under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), including Sections 61, 78, 318, 351, 352, and 356, along with Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended in 2008.


FIR Registration


Following this complaint, an FIR was registered on July 5, 2024, under sections 78, 79, 318(2), 352, 356(2), 353(2), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023, in conjunction with Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended in 2008. The FIR has been lodged against X Corp and other involved parties by the Cyber Cell, Maharashtra.


Implications and Legal Precedents


This case highlights the growing concern over the misuse of social media platforms to spread false information and defamatory content. It underscores the need for legal frameworks and regulatory oversight to protect individuals from unwarranted attacks on their reputation. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for similar cases in the future, particularly concerning the responsibilities of social media platforms and the accountability of anonymous users.


Conclusion


As the legal proceedings continue, the case draws attention to the broader issues of cyber defamation and the responsibilities of social media users and platforms. The court's decision will be closely watched, given its potential implications for online speech and privacy.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more