Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Anjali Birla Files Defamation Suit in Delhi High Court Over Alleged False Claims on Social Media

Anjali Birla Files Defamation Suit in Delhi High Court

Over Alleged False Claims on Social Media



Anjali Birla, an Indian Railway Personnel Service (IRPS) officer and daughter of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, has filed a defamation suit in the Delhi High Court. The suit aims to remove defamatory social media posts alleging that she cleared the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) exams on her first attempt due to her father's influence.


False Allegations and Defamation Claims


In her legal filing, Anjali Birla asserts that several social media posts are disseminating misleading and false information about her, which she claims are defamatory. The posts allegedly suggest that her successful clearing of the UPSC exams was influenced by her father’s political standing, rather than merit. Anjali contends that these allegations are not only baseless but are also intended to unlawfully tarnish her reputation and professional standing.


Court Proceedings


Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi High Court has agreed to hear the matter, following a request for an urgent listing made by Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, who is representing Anjali Birla. The suit names several defendants, including the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Google Inc, X Corp (formerly Twitter), and John Doe, which refers to unknown parties involved in disseminating the defamatory content.


Allegations of Targeting and Reputation Damage


The suit claims that individuals behind these social media posts aim to damage Anjali Birla's professional reputation without any factual basis, potentially to create controversies against the current government and specifically target her. The lawsuit also seeks to protect the reputation of her family members, including her father, Om Birla, the Hon'ble Speaker of the 18th Lok Sabha of India.


Legal Actions and Complaints


Anjali Birla, through a representative, has filed a complaint with the Inspector General of Police, Cyber Cell, Maharashtra. The complaint targets several Twitter account holders and other individuals, known and unknown, for committing offenses under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), including Sections 61, 78, 318, 351, 352, and 356, along with Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended in 2008.


FIR Registration


Following this complaint, an FIR was registered on July 5, 2024, under sections 78, 79, 318(2), 352, 356(2), 353(2), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023, in conjunction with Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended in 2008. The FIR has been lodged against X Corp and other involved parties by the Cyber Cell, Maharashtra.


Implications and Legal Precedents


This case highlights the growing concern over the misuse of social media platforms to spread false information and defamatory content. It underscores the need for legal frameworks and regulatory oversight to protect individuals from unwarranted attacks on their reputation. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for similar cases in the future, particularly concerning the responsibilities of social media platforms and the accountability of anonymous users.


Conclusion


As the legal proceedings continue, the case draws attention to the broader issues of cyber defamation and the responsibilities of social media users and platforms. The court's decision will be closely watched, given its potential implications for online speech and privacy.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more