Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Land for Job PMLA Case: Delhi HC Grants Interim Bail to Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds

Land for Job PMLA Case: Delhi HC Grants Interim Bail to 

Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds



In a significant development, the Delhi High Court granted six weeks of interim bail to businessman Amit Katyal on medical grounds on Wednesday. Katyal is a co-accused in the high-profile Land for Job money laundering case, which also involves prominent figures like Rabri Devi and other accused individuals.


Overview of the Case


The Land for Job case is a major money laundering investigation in which several high-profile individuals, including Rabri Devi, have been charge-sheeted. The case revolves around allegations of providing jobs in exchange for land, a scheme purportedly involving significant sums of money.


Amit Katyal's Bail Plea


Amit Katyal had previously been on interim bail for 84 days on medical grounds. His recent plea for interim bail was similarly based on his medical condition. The vacation bench of Justice Dharmesh Sharma granted the interim bail for a period of six weeks, taking into account Katyal's medical history and current health status.


Justice Sharma's judgement, delivered on June 26, highlighted the necessity of prioritizing justice and the rule of law. The court noted that despite the filing of the charge sheet against Katyal, the investigation is still ongoing for the co-accused.


Court's Observations


The High Court emphasized that Katyal did not misuse his liberty during his previous interim bail. The court stated, "The petitioner was earlier also on interim bail on medical grounds for about 84 days, and nothing is attributed against him so as to claim that he interfered with or influenced the course of the investigation in any manner."


The court also examined the medical reports from AIIMS and DDU Hospital, concluding that the prison facilities could not adequately meet Katyal's medical and dietary needs. Justice Sharma noted that post-Bariatric Surgery, Katyal required specific dietary and medical care that could not be provided in jail.


Legal Representation and Arguments


Senior advocate Aman Lekhi, representing Katyal, argued that his client suffers from multiple morbidities and acute obesity, conditions that necessitate a strict diet post-Bariatric Surgery. The court was informed that Katyal had lost 14 kgs and experienced intermittent bouts of blood vomiting, necessitating a special diet and continuous monitoring.


On the other hand, Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain opposed the bail plea, arguing that Katyal was attempting to review a previous court order and that he had already been on interim bail for an extensive period. Hossain stressed that medical grounds should not be a perpetual basis for bail.


Court's Conclusion


The High Court concluded that Katyal's medical condition warranted his release on interim bail. Justice Sharma's order stated, "The level of care, attention, minute-to-minute monitoring and emergency response which the applicant requires, cannot be provided at the jail presently."


Implications of the Ruling


This ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to the rule of law and the humane treatment of individuals under judicial custody, especially when medical conditions are involved. It also highlights the ongoing nature of the Land for Job PMLA case, which continues to unravel the complexities of alleged money laundering and corruption.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more