Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Land for Job PMLA Case: Delhi HC Grants Interim Bail to Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds

Land for Job PMLA Case: Delhi HC Grants Interim Bail to 

Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds



In a significant development, the Delhi High Court granted six weeks of interim bail to businessman Amit Katyal on medical grounds on Wednesday. Katyal is a co-accused in the high-profile Land for Job money laundering case, which also involves prominent figures like Rabri Devi and other accused individuals.


Overview of the Case


The Land for Job case is a major money laundering investigation in which several high-profile individuals, including Rabri Devi, have been charge-sheeted. The case revolves around allegations of providing jobs in exchange for land, a scheme purportedly involving significant sums of money.


Amit Katyal's Bail Plea


Amit Katyal had previously been on interim bail for 84 days on medical grounds. His recent plea for interim bail was similarly based on his medical condition. The vacation bench of Justice Dharmesh Sharma granted the interim bail for a period of six weeks, taking into account Katyal's medical history and current health status.


Justice Sharma's judgement, delivered on June 26, highlighted the necessity of prioritizing justice and the rule of law. The court noted that despite the filing of the charge sheet against Katyal, the investigation is still ongoing for the co-accused.


Court's Observations


The High Court emphasized that Katyal did not misuse his liberty during his previous interim bail. The court stated, "The petitioner was earlier also on interim bail on medical grounds for about 84 days, and nothing is attributed against him so as to claim that he interfered with or influenced the course of the investigation in any manner."


The court also examined the medical reports from AIIMS and DDU Hospital, concluding that the prison facilities could not adequately meet Katyal's medical and dietary needs. Justice Sharma noted that post-Bariatric Surgery, Katyal required specific dietary and medical care that could not be provided in jail.


Legal Representation and Arguments


Senior advocate Aman Lekhi, representing Katyal, argued that his client suffers from multiple morbidities and acute obesity, conditions that necessitate a strict diet post-Bariatric Surgery. The court was informed that Katyal had lost 14 kgs and experienced intermittent bouts of blood vomiting, necessitating a special diet and continuous monitoring.


On the other hand, Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain opposed the bail plea, arguing that Katyal was attempting to review a previous court order and that he had already been on interim bail for an extensive period. Hossain stressed that medical grounds should not be a perpetual basis for bail.


Court's Conclusion


The High Court concluded that Katyal's medical condition warranted his release on interim bail. Justice Sharma's order stated, "The level of care, attention, minute-to-minute monitoring and emergency response which the applicant requires, cannot be provided at the jail presently."


Implications of the Ruling


This ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to the rule of law and the humane treatment of individuals under judicial custody, especially when medical conditions are involved. It also highlights the ongoing nature of the Land for Job PMLA case, which continues to unravel the complexities of alleged money laundering and corruption.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law