Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi High Court to Rule on Bibhav Kumar's Plea Against Arrest in Swati Maliwal 'Assault' Case

Delhi High Court to Rule on Bibhav Kumar's Plea Against 

Arrest in Swati Maliwal 'Assault' Case

               

The Delhi High Court is set to deliver a crucial verdict on July 1, 2024, regarding the maintainability of a plea filed by Bibhav Kumar, a close aide of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. Kumar is seeking a declaration that his arrest by Delhi Police in connection with the Swati Maliwal assault case was illegal.


Background of the Case


Bibhav Kumar was arrested by the Delhi Police on May 18, 2024, following an FIR registered by Rajya Sabha MP Swati Maliwal, who alleged assault. Kumar’s plea contends that his arrest was in violation of legal procedures, particularly the guidelines outlined in Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).


Court Proceedings


Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma reserved the order on the maintainability of Kumar's plea after hearing arguments on May 31, 2024. Senior Advocate N Hariharan, representing Kumar, argued that the arrest was conducted improperly, emphasizing the timing of the arrest during an ongoing anticipatory bail hearing. He claimed this violated Kumar's fundamental rights.


Arguments from Delhi Police


On the other side, Senior Advocate Sanjay Jain, representing Delhi Police, argued that the plea is not maintainable. He highlighted that the trial court had found reasons for the emergent arrest and that Kumar should have pursued a revision application within the prescribed 90-day period instead of directly approaching the High Court.


Compensation and Departmental Action


Kumar's plea also seeks appropriate compensation for the alleged illegal arrest and calls for departmental action against the officials involved in the decision-making process leading to his arrest.


Previous Court Decisions


Earlier, the trial court denied Kumar’s bail petition, citing concerns that he might influence witnesses or tamper with evidence. The court noted the nascent stage of the investigation and emphasized the severity of the allegations. The trial court's order also mentioned that Kumar had not cooperated with the investigation and had formatted his mobile phone, complicating the collection of evidence.


Arguments from the Complainant’s Counsel


The complainant’s counsel argued that Swati Maliwal, an Aam Aadmi Party MP, had legitimate reasons to be at the Chief Minister's office, whereas Kumar’s presence there was unauthorized. They highlighted that the complaint was made immediately by Maliwal and that her injuries were significant enough to be documented days after the alleged assault.


Conclusion


The upcoming decision by the Delhi High Court will have significant implications for the case and could set a precedent regarding the procedural aspects of arrests and anticipatory bail hearings. The ruling will be closely watched by legal experts and political observers alike.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more