Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Delhi HC Refuses to Suspend Sentence of Former BJP MLA Senger in Unnao Rape Victim's Father's Custodial Death Case

Delhi HC Refuses to Suspend Sentence of Former BJP MLA Senger in Unnao Rape Victim's Father's Custodial Death Case



The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed the plea of former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar, seeking suspension of his sentence during the appeal against his conviction. Sengar is currently serving a 10-year sentence in connection with the custodial death of the father of a rape victim from Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. He has been in custody since April 13, 2018.


Background of the Case


Kuldeep Singh Sengar, along with other accused, was convicted by the Tis Hazari Court in 2018. Sengar is also serving a life sentence for the rape of a minor, stemming from FIRs filed in 2018 at Police Station Makhi, Unnao. These cases were adjudicated by the District and Sessions Judge (West) at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.


High Court's Ruling


Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma dismissed Sengar’s plea for suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal. The High Court acknowledged that Sengar has served six out of the ten years of his imprisonment. However, the court emphasized that the period undergone by a convict is just one factor among several others, such as the gravity of the offense, the nature of the crime, and the impact on public confidence in the judicial system.


Legal Considerations


The High Court noted that the presumption of innocence is erased once the accused has been found guilty. Therefore, in applications seeking suspension of sentence, courts take a prima facie view of the role of the accused and the gravity of the offense as recorded in the conviction judgment. Justice Sharma emphasized that the arguments on the merits of the appeal would be addressed on August 7, depending on how much time the counsels for the co-accused take.


Arguments and Counterarguments


Sengar's counsel argued that the appellant had been in custody since April 13, 2018, and had not misused the liberty granted to him during a brief interim suspension for his daughter’s marriage. The counsel highlighted that Sengar had already served almost six years of his ten-year sentence and that other co-accused who had served more than half of their imprisonment had been granted suspension of sentence.


In contrast, Advocate Ravi Sharma, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), opposed the plea, arguing that Sengar was a key person in the commission of the offense. The SPP pointed out that Sengar's conviction was for causing the death of a witness in a rape case, highlighting the gravity and seriousness of the crime.


Details of the Offense


The background of the case dates back to June 4, 2017, when the minor daughter of the victim was allegedly raped by Sengar after being enticed on the pretext of getting a job. On April 3, 2018, the victim's father was brutally assaulted by the accused in broad daylight while traveling to Unnao for a court hearing. He was later arrested and allegedly succumbed to injuries inflicted during police custody on April 9, 2018.


Transfer of Trial and Protection Orders


The Supreme Court transferred the trial of five related cases from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi on August 1, 2019, and directed the trial to be concluded within 45 days. The apex court also provided protection to the minor rape victim, her lawyer, mother, and other immediate family members, a protection that remains in place to date.


Legal Implications and Future Proceedings


The refusal to suspend Sengar’s sentence underscores the judicial system’s stance on the gravity of the crime and the importance of maintaining public confidence. The next hearing on the merits of the appeal is scheduled for August 7, which will be crucial in determining the future course of this high-profile case.


Conclusion


The Delhi High Court's decision highlights the complex balance between individual rights and public interest in the judicial process. As the case progresses, it will continue to draw significant attention, reflecting the judiciary's commitment to addressing grave offenses with the seriousness they warrant.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more