Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi Excise Policy PMLA Case: Rs 100 Crore Bribe Allegation and Bail Plea

Delhi Excise Policy PMLA Case: Rs 100 Crore Bribe 

Allegation and Bail Plea


The controversy surrounding the Delhi Excise Policy continues to deepen as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposes the bail plea of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The ED has alleged a demand for a Rs 100 crore bribe, asserting the involvement of Kejriwal in money laundering activities.


Bribe Demand and Money Laundering:  

The ED has established that a significant amount of money, totaling Rs 100 crore, was demanded as a bribe. This money, according to the ED, was funneled through hawala transactions, with Chanpreet Singh identified as the individual who facilitated these transactions. The ED claims that a substantial amount of this money was given to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in cash and was used to fund a luxurious 7-star hotel stay for Kejriwal.


Prosecution's Standpoint:

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju, representing the ED, argued that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has shown Kejriwal’s direct involvement in demanding the bribe. Raju emphasized that despite Kejriwal not being listed as an accused in the charge sheets by the CBI, the ED’s case, built on the statements of three approvers and circumstantial evidence, firmly establishes his involvement in money laundering. The ASG pointed out that the timing of the arrest, which has been questioned by Kejriwal’s defense, is irrelevant if the offense is established.


Defense's Counterarguments:

Senior advocate Vikram Chaudhari, representing Kejriwal, argued that Kejriwal is not named as an accused in the CBI’s charges and has been granted interim bail by the Supreme Court. Chaudhari highlighted that the evidence presented by the ED is weak and based largely on statements from tainted individuals. He raised concerns about the timing of the arrest, suggesting it was politically motivated, given Kejriwal's significant political stature and the upcoming elections.


Court's Considerations:

Vacation Judge Nyay Bindu at the Rouse Avenue Court has scheduled the matter for further hearing. The judge acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and emphasized the need for a swift decision. The court is examining whether the evidence against Kejriwal, which includes statements from approvers and circumstantial details, is sufficient to deny bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).


Legal Implications:

ASG Raju argued that under PMLA, bail can only be granted if there is a reason to believe that the accused is not guilty. The ED maintains that the evidence, though circumstantial, points towards Kejriwal’s involvement in money laundering and bribery, thus justifying his arrest and continued custody.


Broader Context and Implications


This case has significant political and legal ramifications. The allegations against a sitting Chief Minister, especially one as prominent as Arvind Kejriwal, underscore the complex interplay between politics and law enforcement in India. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching effects on the political landscape and the future of the AAP.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more