Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Delhi Court Sends Arvind Kejriwal to Judicial Custody Till July 12

Delhi Court Sends Arvind Kejriwal to Judicial Custody 

Till July 12



In a significant development, the Delhi Court has sent Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal to judicial custody until July 12 in connection with the excise policy case. The decision came after Kejriwal’s three-day Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) custody ended, and the court decided not to extend it further.


Court's Decision and Immediate Reactions


The Rouse Avenue Court of Delhi ordered the judicial remand of Arvind Kejriwal, following arguments presented by both the prosecution and defense. Advocate DP Singh, representing the CBI, argued that Kejriwal had been uncooperative during his police custody, providing evasive replies contrary to the evidence on record. The court found these arguments sufficient to warrant judicial custody.


AAP’s Response


The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has called the court’s decision a conspiracy orchestrated by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). AAP leader Sanjay Singh criticized the CBI's arguments as baseless and reiterated that Kejriwal is being falsely implicated. Delhi Environment Minister Gopal Rai echoed these sentiments, stating that the arrests of AAP ministers and the Chief Minister are part of a larger campaign by the BJP to dismantle the Delhi government.


Nationwide Protests


In response to the court's decision, AAP held nationwide protests, asserting that Kejriwal’s arrest is politically motivated. The party emphasized that the trial court had earlier granted bail to Kejriwal, and the Delhi High Court’s stay on the bail order came without a proper hearing.


BJP’s Stance


Contrarily, the BJP has welcomed the court's decision. Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva asserted that the law is taking its course and that those who have committed crimes must face the consequences. He criticized the Delhi government's focus on the excise policy during the second wave of COVID-19, suggesting that their priorities were misplaced.


Legal Proceedings and Accusations


Advocate Rishikesh Kumar, representing Kejriwal, opposed the judicial remand, arguing that the CBI had no grounds to seek it. He also requested the court to ensure Kejriwal receives his diabetes medicines, test kits, and home-cooked food during his custody, which the court granted.


The CBI's accusations against Kejriwal include his failure to explain the enhancement of profit margins for wholesalers under the new Excise Policy of Delhi 2021-22 and the hurried approval of the revised policy during the peak of the second COVID-19 wave. The CBI also claimed that Kejriwal was involved in meetings where illegal gratification was demanded from liquor business stakeholders and that ill-gotten money was used in the Goa Assembly Elections.


Future Proceedings


Kejriwal will be produced before the court again on July 12. His legal team plans to move a bail application early next week, hoping for a favorable outcome.


Conclusion


The judicial custody of Arvind Kejriwal has sparked significant political and legal controversy, with the AAP alleging a political conspiracy and the BJP insisting on the due process of law. As the case progresses, all eyes will be on the forthcoming court hearings and the legal strategies employed by both sides.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more