Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Pune Porsche Accident: Juvenile Accused's Bail Cancelled, Sent to Observation Home

Pune Porsche Accident: Juvenile Accused's Bail Cancelled, Sent to Observation Home



In a significant development in the Pune Porsche accident case, the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) has cancelled the bail of the 17-year-old boy accused of causing the deaths of a biker and a pillion rider. The accused has been remanded to a juvenile observation home for 14 days, until June 5, as confirmed by Pune Police Commissioner Amitesh Kumar.


The Incident


The tragic accident occurred on May 19, 2024, in Pune's Kalyani Nagar. The luxury car, driven by the juvenile, collided with a motorcycle, resulting in the deaths of two young IT professionals, Ashwini Koshta and Aneesh Awadhia, both from Madhya Pradesh. The initial investigation revealed that the accused had been served alcohol at a bar prior to the accident, raising questions about the accountability of the establishment.


Legal Proceedings


The Pune Police filed a review application with the JJB, requesting that the accused be tried as an adult and be remanded to a juvenile observation home. Commissioner Amitesh Kumar stated, "We had filed in a review application before the Juvenile Justice Board, praying that the accused be tried as an adult and that he be sent to a remand home." The board has yet to make a final decision on whether the accused will be tried as an adult.


Advocate Prashant Patil, representing the accused, opposed the application, arguing that it was not maintainable under Section 104 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. This section outlines the procedural aspects for appeals and reviews under the Act. Despite the opposition, the JJB directed that the minor be detained in a juvenile observation home.


Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015


The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, is a comprehensive legislation in India that provides for the care, protection, development, treatment, and rehabilitation of children in conflict with the law. Key provisions relevant to this case include:


- Section 104: Outlines the procedural aspects for appeals and reviews.

- Section 15: Allows for juveniles aged 16-18 involved in heinous crimes to be tried as adults, subject to a preliminary assessment by the JJB regarding the child's mental and physical capacity to commit the offense, the circumstances, and the child's ability to understand the consequences of the offense.

- Section 74: Prohibits the disclosure of the identity of children involved in legal proceedings.


Ongoing Investigations


In addition to the review application, the police are also investigating the bar where the accused was served alcohol. It was found that the establishment did not display a mandatory notice prohibiting the sale of alcohol to minors. The staff of the bar is currently under scrutiny, and their custody has been sought by the police.


Father's Custody and Legal Implications


The father of the juvenile accused has been detained and sent to police custody until May 24. Advocate Asim Saraode highlighted that the court rejected the father's plea for bail based on its legal grounds and placed him under judicial custody. This indicates the stringent measures taken by the authorities in response to the accident and the subsequent legal violations.


Privacy Concerns


The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has urged activists and media personnel to refrain from disclosing the identity of the minor involved, in compliance with Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act. NCPCR Chairperson Priyank Kanoongo emphasized that revealing the identity of juvenile offenders or victims is a punishable offense under the Act.


Conclusion


The cancellation of bail for the 17-year-old accused in the Pune Porsche accident case marks a critical step in the ongoing legal process. The Juvenile Justice Board's decision to remand the minor to an observation home underscores the seriousness of the charges and the need for a thorough judicial review. As the case progresses, the focus remains on ensuring justice for the victims while adhering to the legal protections afforded to juveniles under the Juvenile Justice Act.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law