Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Protecting Personality: Jackie Shroff's Legal Battle in Delhi HC

 Protecting Personality: Jackie Shroff's Legal Battle in Delhi HC



Actor Jackie Shroff has taken legal action to safeguard his personality and publicity rights by filing a suit in the Delhi High Court. The suit targets various entities that have been using his name, photographs, voice, and the iconic moniker "Bhidu" without his consent.


Seeking Legal Intervention


Through this legal recourse, Jackie Shroff seeks the court's intervention to protect his name, voice, image, likeness, and all other elements of his persona that are distinctive and exclusively identifiable with him. The unauthorized use of these attributes by third parties has the potential to create confusion and deception among the public.


Court's Response


Justice Sanjeev Narula's bench has issued a summons on the actor's suit and will consider the case's interim injunction application. Jackie Shroff is seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing upon his personality and publicity rights for commercial or personal gain.


Grounds for Legal Action


Specifically, the plea seeks to prevent the unauthorized use of Jackie Shroff's name, aliases like 'Jackie', 'Jaggu Dada', and 'Bhidu', as well as his voice, image, and any other attribute exclusively identifiable with him. Additionally, it addresses the infringement of his moral rights in his performances under the Copyright Act, of 1957.


Unauthorized Use Highlighted


The suit highlights instances where defendants have extracted clips from movies featuring Jackie Shroff's performances without his consent, for the creation and dissemination of content such as GIFs. Such unauthorized use not only violates his moral rights but also brings disrepute to him and subjects him to unsavory humor.


Legal Basis


The legal action taken by Jackie Shroff is grounded in the protection of his personality and publicity rights. These rights allow individuals to control the commercial use of their likeness and prevent unauthorized exploitation. The misappropriation of any attribute of Jackie Shroff's persona for commercial purposes is liable to be restrained, based on the tort of dilution, particularly tarnishment.


Industry Precedent


This case adds to a series of similar legal battles in the entertainment industry. Recently, the Delhi High Court restrained the unauthorized use of actor Anil Kapoor's personality or name for commercial purposes. Similarly, in 2022, actor Amitabh Bachchan also approached the Delhi HC against the illegal use of his voice and image.


Significance


As the case unfolds in the Delhi High Court, it underscores the importance of protecting celebrities' rights over their own identity and image. The outcome of this legal battle will not only impact Jackie Shroff's rights but also set a precedent for the protection of personality and publicity rights in India's entertainment industry.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more