Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Protecting Personality: Jackie Shroff's Legal Battle in Delhi HC

 Protecting Personality: Jackie Shroff's Legal Battle in Delhi HC



Actor Jackie Shroff has taken legal action to safeguard his personality and publicity rights by filing a suit in the Delhi High Court. The suit targets various entities that have been using his name, photographs, voice, and the iconic moniker "Bhidu" without his consent.


Seeking Legal Intervention


Through this legal recourse, Jackie Shroff seeks the court's intervention to protect his name, voice, image, likeness, and all other elements of his persona that are distinctive and exclusively identifiable with him. The unauthorized use of these attributes by third parties has the potential to create confusion and deception among the public.


Court's Response


Justice Sanjeev Narula's bench has issued a summons on the actor's suit and will consider the case's interim injunction application. Jackie Shroff is seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing upon his personality and publicity rights for commercial or personal gain.


Grounds for Legal Action


Specifically, the plea seeks to prevent the unauthorized use of Jackie Shroff's name, aliases like 'Jackie', 'Jaggu Dada', and 'Bhidu', as well as his voice, image, and any other attribute exclusively identifiable with him. Additionally, it addresses the infringement of his moral rights in his performances under the Copyright Act, of 1957.


Unauthorized Use Highlighted


The suit highlights instances where defendants have extracted clips from movies featuring Jackie Shroff's performances without his consent, for the creation and dissemination of content such as GIFs. Such unauthorized use not only violates his moral rights but also brings disrepute to him and subjects him to unsavory humor.


Legal Basis


The legal action taken by Jackie Shroff is grounded in the protection of his personality and publicity rights. These rights allow individuals to control the commercial use of their likeness and prevent unauthorized exploitation. The misappropriation of any attribute of Jackie Shroff's persona for commercial purposes is liable to be restrained, based on the tort of dilution, particularly tarnishment.


Industry Precedent


This case adds to a series of similar legal battles in the entertainment industry. Recently, the Delhi High Court restrained the unauthorized use of actor Anil Kapoor's personality or name for commercial purposes. Similarly, in 2022, actor Amitabh Bachchan also approached the Delhi HC against the illegal use of his voice and image.


Significance


As the case unfolds in the Delhi High Court, it underscores the importance of protecting celebrities' rights over their own identity and image. The outcome of this legal battle will not only impact Jackie Shroff's rights but also set a precedent for the protection of personality and publicity rights in India's entertainment industry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law