Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Supreme Court's Firm Stance: No Room for Misleading Advertisements

Supreme Court's Firm Stance: No Room for Misleading Advertisements


Supreme Court Rebukes Uttarakhand Government


The Supreme Court issued a stern rebuke to the Uttarakhand government for its inaction against Patanjali Ayurved in a case concerning misleading advertisements. The court also refused to accept the apologies offered by Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna.


Concerns Raised by the Apex Court


A bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed concerns over the impact of misleading advertisements on unsuspecting consumers. The court emphasized the need for accountability, particularly for FMCG companies like Patanjali Ayurved.


Directive to Uttarakhand Government


The apex court directed the Uttarakhand government to take decisive action against officials who failed to act on complaints regarding Patanjali Ayurved's advertisements. It stressed the importance of sending a strong message to society about complying with court orders.


Refusal to Accept Apology


Despite the apologies tendered by Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, the Supreme Court refused to accept them, considering them a deliberate violation of the court's orders. The court emphasized the need for genuine remorse and compliance with the law.


Commitment to Uphold the Law


In their affidavits, Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna expressed regret for the misleading advertisements and pledged to uphold the majesty of the law. However, the court expressed skepticism about the sincerity of their apologies.


Enforcement of Compliance


The Supreme Court underscored the importance of enforcing compliance with its directives and ensuring accountability at all levels, including government officials and corporate entities.


Conclusion


The case highlights the judiciary's commitment to upholding consumer rights and holding both government authorities and corporations accountable for their actions. It serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical advertising practices and adherence to legal obligations.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more