Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...

Supreme Court Dismisses L&T Plea Over Sharavathi Tendering Process

Supreme Court Dismisses L&T Plea Over Sharavathi Tendering Process



In a recent development, the Supreme Court has rejected the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Larsen & Toubro (L&T), a prominent infrastructure company, challenging the tendering process for the prestigious Sharavathi Pumped Storage project. The decision came on Monday, following a thorough consideration by the bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud.


Background and Decision


The apex court stated, "We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India," thereby dismissing L&T's plea.


L&T had contested the order of the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice NV Anjaria and Justice Krishna S Dixit of the Karnataka High Court. However, their appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court.


Implications for the Sharavathi Project


The Sharavathi pumped storage project, a significant hydroelectric initiative, has been the subject of contention. Currently managed by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL), the tender for the project was secured by the Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd group, which proposed a lower price.


The Sharavathi River serves as a crucial source of hydroelectric power in Karnataka, making the project a matter of considerable importance for the state's energy infrastructure development.


Legal Implications and Context


The dismissal of L&T's plea by the Supreme Court carries legal implications, particularly concerning the tendering process and contractual agreements in public infrastructure projects. Under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court holds discretionary power to grant special leave to appeal against any judgment, decree, determination, sentence, or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in the territory of India. In this case, the court's decision signifies a definitive stance on the validity of the tendering process for the Sharavathi Pumped Storage project.


Additionally, the dispute highlights the significance of transparent and fair tendering processes in government infrastructure projects. The selection of contractors through competitive bidding ensures efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to regulatory standards. By upholding the decision of the Karnataka High Court, the Supreme Court reaffirms the integrity of the tendering process and the principle of equitable competition in public sector undertakings.


Conclusion and Future Implications


As the legal proceedings conclude, stakeholders in the energy sector will closely monitor the implementation of the Sharavathi pumped storage project and its implications for Karnataka's energy landscape. The court's ruling underscores the importance of upholding legal frameworks and procedural fairness in infrastructure development initiatives, safeguarding public interest, and ensuring accountability in governance.


The outcome of this case sets a precedent for future disputes related to tendering processes and underscores the judiciary's role in upholding transparency and integrity in public procurement practices.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Equality Before Law