Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Delhi Excise Policy Case: ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against Arrest, Cites Evidence

Delhi Excise Policy Case: ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against Arrest, Cites Evidence



Enforcement Directorate's Affidavit:


The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed an affidavit opposing Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea against his arrest. Alleging non-cooperation, the agency stated that Kejriwal avoided interrogation despite multiple summons, further exacerbating the necessity of his arrest. The ED underscored instances where Kejriwal allegedly failed to appear before the investigating officer despite being summoned nine times.


Kejriwal's Conduct and Evidence:


In its affidavit, the ED contends that Kejriwal's conduct significantly contributed to the grounds for his arrest, alongside the material evidence gathered during the investigation. Additionally, the agency highlighted instances where crucial evidence, including data from approximately 170 mobile phones, was allegedly destroyed by individuals involved in the scam.


Recovery of Key Evidence:


Despite the extensive destruction of evidence, the ED claims to have recovered key evidence directly linking Kejriwal to activities related to the proceeds of crime. The affidavit also pointed out instances where Kejriwal allegedly refused to provide passwords to his mobile phones during searches and custody, and gave evasive answers during questioning.


Bonafide Arrest and Legal Principles:


The agency emphasized that Kejriwal's arrest was bona fide and not motivated by extraneous reasons. It argued that treating a politician differently in matters of arrest would violate the principle of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. The investigation into the liquor scam, the affidavit stated, must be viewed in the context of large-scale destruction of evidence.


Kejriwal's Appeal and High Court Dismissal:


Kejriwal's appeal to the apex court challenges his arrest and subsequent remand in the excise policy case, contending that it was motivated by extraneous considerations. However, the Delhi High Court had earlier dismissed his plea, citing his non-cooperation with ED summons over six months.


Case Significance and Legal Framework:


The case underscores the legal framework surrounding arrests and investigations, particularly in cases of alleged financial irregularities, and the obligations of individuals under investigation to cooperate with law enforcement agencies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law