Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal Vows to Reopen 750 Madrasas in Assam through Supreme Court

 AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal Vows to Reopen 750 Madrasas in Assam through Supreme Court



Badruddin Ajmal, the Chief of the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), has pledged to reopen 750 madrasas in Assam if his party emerges victorious in the Lok Sabha elections. Ajmal made this statement during a campaign rally in Karimganj, Assam, emphasizing his commitment to providing education opportunities for Muslim students in the state.


Legal Battle Ahead


Ajmal stated that the reopening of these madrasas would be pursued through legal channels, particularly by petitioning the Supreme Court. He cited a previous Supreme Court ruling that criticized the Uttar Pradesh government's attempt to close madrasas, suggesting that a similar approach could be taken in Assam.


Controversial Government Actions


The announcement comes in the wake of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma's decision to close or convert several madrasas into general schools during his tenure. Ajmal's promise to reopen these institutions reflects a broader debate over the government's role in regulating religious education.


Education as a Right


Ajmal emphasized that the reopening of madrasas would solely serve educational purposes, highlighting the right to education as a fundamental right for all citizens. He questioned the government's decision to deprive Muslim students of educational opportunities and asserted the importance of safeguarding this right.


Legal Challenge


While expressing his willingness to challenge the government's actions, Ajmal reiterated his commitment to pursuing legal avenues rather than resorting to confrontation. He affirmed his party's resolve to contest the government's decisions in court, reflecting a commitment to democratic principles and legal recourse.


Political Implications


The AIUDF chief's statement comes amidst ongoing Lok Sabha elections in Assam, where the party is contesting in three out of 14 seats. Ajmal's promise to reopen madrasas may appeal to his party's support base, particularly among Muslim voters concerned about educational access and religious rights.


Election Outlook


The Lok Sabha elections in Assam are being closely watched, with the BJP contesting in the majority of seats. The outcome will determine the balance of power in the state and may have broader implications for regional politics.


Conclusion


Badruddin Ajmal's pledge to reopen madrasas in Assam underscores the complex intersection of religion, education, and politics in the state. As the election unfolds, the fate of these institutions will be closely tied to legal battles and political maneuvering, shaping the future landscape of educational policy in Assam.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more