Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal Vows to Reopen 750 Madrasas in Assam through Supreme Court

 AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal Vows to Reopen 750 Madrasas in Assam through Supreme Court



Badruddin Ajmal, the Chief of the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), has pledged to reopen 750 madrasas in Assam if his party emerges victorious in the Lok Sabha elections. Ajmal made this statement during a campaign rally in Karimganj, Assam, emphasizing his commitment to providing education opportunities for Muslim students in the state.


Legal Battle Ahead


Ajmal stated that the reopening of these madrasas would be pursued through legal channels, particularly by petitioning the Supreme Court. He cited a previous Supreme Court ruling that criticized the Uttar Pradesh government's attempt to close madrasas, suggesting that a similar approach could be taken in Assam.


Controversial Government Actions


The announcement comes in the wake of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma's decision to close or convert several madrasas into general schools during his tenure. Ajmal's promise to reopen these institutions reflects a broader debate over the government's role in regulating religious education.


Education as a Right


Ajmal emphasized that the reopening of madrasas would solely serve educational purposes, highlighting the right to education as a fundamental right for all citizens. He questioned the government's decision to deprive Muslim students of educational opportunities and asserted the importance of safeguarding this right.


Legal Challenge


While expressing his willingness to challenge the government's actions, Ajmal reiterated his commitment to pursuing legal avenues rather than resorting to confrontation. He affirmed his party's resolve to contest the government's decisions in court, reflecting a commitment to democratic principles and legal recourse.


Political Implications


The AIUDF chief's statement comes amidst ongoing Lok Sabha elections in Assam, where the party is contesting in three out of 14 seats. Ajmal's promise to reopen madrasas may appeal to his party's support base, particularly among Muslim voters concerned about educational access and religious rights.


Election Outlook


The Lok Sabha elections in Assam are being closely watched, with the BJP contesting in the majority of seats. The outcome will determine the balance of power in the state and may have broader implications for regional politics.


Conclusion


Badruddin Ajmal's pledge to reopen madrasas in Assam underscores the complex intersection of religion, education, and politics in the state. As the election unfolds, the fate of these institutions will be closely tied to legal battles and political maneuvering, shaping the future landscape of educational policy in Assam.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more