Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

US Firmly Backs India's Sovereignty Over Arunachal Pradesh

US Firmly Backs India's Sovereignty Over Arunachal Pradesh



US Stance and China's Response


In a resolute stance against China's territorial claims, the United States has thrown its weight behind India, affirming Arunachal Pradesh as Indian territory and condemning any unilateral efforts by China to assert control. State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel reiterated the US's unwavering support for India's sovereignty over Arunachal Pradesh, particularly denouncing any attempts to advance territorial claims across the Line of Actual Control (LAC).


India's Rejection of China's Claims


The statement from the Biden administration official follows recent provocations by the Chinese military, which reiterated its claim over the northeastern Indian state shortly after Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the region. Despite Beijing's persistent assertions, India has consistently rejected China's claims, emphasizing Arunachal Pradesh's integral status within the Indian Union.


China's Assertion and India's Response


China's renewed claims over Arunachal Pradesh, termed as "Zangan," have intensified tensions in the region. The Chinese Defense Ministry's spokesperson, Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, reiterated Beijing's stance, condemning what it deems as India's "illegal establishment" of Arunachal Pradesh. However, India's Ministry of External Affairs firmly rejected these claims, asserting that Arunachal Pradesh has been, is, and will always remain an integral part of India.


Legal and Constitutional Basis


From a legal standpoint, India's claim to Arunachal Pradesh is firmly grounded in its constitutional provisions and international law. The Indian Constitution enshrines the territorial integrity of the nation, emphasizing the inalienable nature of Arunachal Pradesh as an integral part of India. Additionally, international conventions and agreements, such as the United Nations Charter, uphold the principles of territorial sovereignty and the peaceful resolution of disputes.


Conclusion and Diplomatic Significance


While there may not be specific case laws directly related to the Arunachal Pradesh dispute, past conflicts and diplomatic negotiations between India and China provide valuable insights. The 1962 India-China border conflict and subsequent efforts to address territorial disputes underscore the complexities inherent in resolving such issues through diplomatic channels.


Way Forward


In conclusion, the US's unequivocal support for India's sovereignty over Arunachal Pradesh amplifies the significance of upholding territorial integrity and respecting international norms. As tensions persist between India and China, diplomatic dialogue and adherence to legal frameworks remain crucial in finding a peaceful resolution to the longstanding dispute over Arunachal Pradesh.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more