Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Supreme Court Upholds Fundamental Rights in Politicians' Bail Conditions Case

Supreme Court Upholds Fundamental Rights in Politicians' Bail Conditions Case




Introduction:

In a recent legal development, the Supreme Court of India made a significant ruling regarding bail conditions imposed on politicians, sparking discussions on the delicate balance between legal requirements and fundamental rights. The apex court asserted that imposing restrictions on politicians' participation in political activities as a condition for bail would violate their fundamental rights.


Legal Ruling by the Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered on March 22, overturned a bail condition set by the Orissa High Court, which prohibited a politician from engaging in political activities. Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta deemed such restrictions as an infringement upon the appellant's fundamental rights and subsequently quashed the imposed condition.


Case Background:

The case centered around Siba Shankar Das, a prominent leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and former mayor of Berhampur. Das faced criminal charges following his switch from the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) to the BJP. The Orissa High Court, in its bail order on August 11, 2022, imposed a condition barring Das from engaging in any political activities, directly or indirectly. However, Das contested this condition, arguing that it violated his fundamental rights.


Emphasis on Fundamental Rights:

The Supreme Court's ruling underscored the importance of upholding fundamental rights, even in cases involving serious criminal allegations. The judgment highlighted the need for a delicate balance between legal requirements and constitutional freedoms, particularly concerning politicians' rights to participate in political activities.


Judicial Assertion:

While acknowledging the severity of the criminal cases against Das, the Supreme Court asserted that restricting his political activities would be unjustified. The ruling emphasized the principle that individuals, including politicians, should not face undue limitations on their fundamental rights without compelling justification.


Reaffirmation of Constitutional Provisions:

The case served as a reminder of the constitutional provisions safeguarding fundamental rights, including the right to engage in political activities. It reinforced the judiciary's role in upholding these rights and ensuring that legal proceedings adhere to constitutional principles.


Conclusion:

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirmed the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly concerning political participation. It underscored the judiciary's commitment to upholding these rights in the criminal justice system, setting a precedent for the protection of fundamental freedoms in legal proceedings involving politicians.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more