Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

"Seeking Justice: BJP Leader Pamela Goswami's Legal Battle"

"Seeking Justice: BJP Leader Pamela Goswami's Legal Battle"


BJP Leader Pamela Goswami Seeks Justice in SC Over Illegal Custody in NDPS Case:


Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Pamela Goswami has approached the Supreme Court seeking redressal for alleged grave injustices inflicted upon her, including illegal custody, malicious prosecution, and false implication under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. Goswami's petition highlights her ordeal, spanning years of legal battles and personal trauma, and calls for compensation from the West Bengal government.


Legal Context:


The case revolves around the alleged wrongful prosecution of Pamela Goswami under Sections 21B and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. This Act governs the regulation and control of narcotic substances and provides for stringent penalties for offenses related to drug trafficking and possession. The legal framework concerning compensation for wrongful prosecution and illegal detention includes provisions under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and the Constitution of India.


Constitutional Provisions:


The right to fair trial and due process is enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, guaranteeing the right to life and personal liberty. Additionally, Article 14 ensures equality before the law and equal protection of laws. The state's obligation to provide compensation for wrongful prosecution and illegal detention stems from these constitutional principles, ensuring justice and safeguarding individual rights.


Case Laws:


Several judicial precedents have addressed issues related to wrongful prosecution and compensation. In Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar (1983), the Supreme Court held that compensation should be awarded for deprivation of personal liberty without due process of law. Similarly, in Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1986), the court emphasized the state's duty to compensate victims of wrongful detention and malicious prosecution.


Conclusion:


Pamela Goswami's plea for justice underscores the importance of upholding constitutional rights and ensuring accountability in law enforcement. The legal battle highlights the need for fair and transparent judicial proceedings, free from political interference and undue influence. As the case unfolds, adherence to legal principles, constitutional provisions, and judicial precedents will be crucial in delivering justice and restoring Goswami's rights and dignity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law