Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

"Seeking Justice: BJP Leader Pamela Goswami's Legal Battle"

"Seeking Justice: BJP Leader Pamela Goswami's Legal Battle"


BJP Leader Pamela Goswami Seeks Justice in SC Over Illegal Custody in NDPS Case:


Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Pamela Goswami has approached the Supreme Court seeking redressal for alleged grave injustices inflicted upon her, including illegal custody, malicious prosecution, and false implication under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. Goswami's petition highlights her ordeal, spanning years of legal battles and personal trauma, and calls for compensation from the West Bengal government.


Legal Context:


The case revolves around the alleged wrongful prosecution of Pamela Goswami under Sections 21B and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. This Act governs the regulation and control of narcotic substances and provides for stringent penalties for offenses related to drug trafficking and possession. The legal framework concerning compensation for wrongful prosecution and illegal detention includes provisions under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and the Constitution of India.


Constitutional Provisions:


The right to fair trial and due process is enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, guaranteeing the right to life and personal liberty. Additionally, Article 14 ensures equality before the law and equal protection of laws. The state's obligation to provide compensation for wrongful prosecution and illegal detention stems from these constitutional principles, ensuring justice and safeguarding individual rights.


Case Laws:


Several judicial precedents have addressed issues related to wrongful prosecution and compensation. In Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar (1983), the Supreme Court held that compensation should be awarded for deprivation of personal liberty without due process of law. Similarly, in Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1986), the court emphasized the state's duty to compensate victims of wrongful detention and malicious prosecution.


Conclusion:


Pamela Goswami's plea for justice underscores the importance of upholding constitutional rights and ensuring accountability in law enforcement. The legal battle highlights the need for fair and transparent judicial proceedings, free from political interference and undue influence. As the case unfolds, adherence to legal principles, constitutional provisions, and judicial precedents will be crucial in delivering justice and restoring Goswami's rights and dignity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more