Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

SC Declines Petition Alleging EVM Irregularities

SC Declines Petition Alleging EVM Irregularities



Background:

The Supreme Court's recent refusal to entertain a petition alleging irregularities in the functioning of electronic voting machines (EVMs) has once again brought attention to the ongoing debates surrounding electoral transparency and the use of technology in the democratic process. The petition, filed by Nandini Sharma, raised concerns about potential flaws in EVMs and sought judicial intervention to address them.


Legal Framework:

In India, the use of EVMs is governed primarily by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. These laws outline the procedures and regulations concerning the conduct of elections, including the use of voting machines. Additionally, the Election Commission of India (ECI) plays a crucial role in overseeing the electoral process and ensuring its fairness and integrity.


Constitutional Provisions:

The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to free and fair elections as a fundamental aspect of democracy. Articles 324 to 329 of the Constitution confer powers upon the ECI to conduct elections to the Parliament, state legislatures, and offices of the President and Vice-President. These provisions underscore the importance of electoral integrity and the role of independent institutions in upholding democratic principles.


Case Law:

The Supreme Court has previously addressed several petitions related to EVMs, acknowledging both the significance of electoral transparency and the challenges associated with technological advancements. In past cases, the court has emphasized the need for robust safeguards to prevent tampering or manipulation of EVMs. Notably, in a recent case, the court rejected a petition alleging irregularities in the Election Commission's handling of EVM scrutiny, reaffirming its trust in the electoral process while underscoring the importance of due diligence.


Conclusion:

While concerns about the functioning of EVMs persist, the Supreme Court's decision not to entertain the recent petition reflects a broader judicial stance on electoral matters. The court's reluctance to intervene in every petition related to EVMs highlights the need for a balanced approach that addresses genuine concerns while maintaining confidence in the electoral process. As India prepares for future elections, ensuring transparency, accountability, and public trust in the electoral machinery remains paramount.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more