Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

SC Declines Petition Alleging EVM Irregularities

SC Declines Petition Alleging EVM Irregularities



Background:

The Supreme Court's recent refusal to entertain a petition alleging irregularities in the functioning of electronic voting machines (EVMs) has once again brought attention to the ongoing debates surrounding electoral transparency and the use of technology in the democratic process. The petition, filed by Nandini Sharma, raised concerns about potential flaws in EVMs and sought judicial intervention to address them.


Legal Framework:

In India, the use of EVMs is governed primarily by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. These laws outline the procedures and regulations concerning the conduct of elections, including the use of voting machines. Additionally, the Election Commission of India (ECI) plays a crucial role in overseeing the electoral process and ensuring its fairness and integrity.


Constitutional Provisions:

The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to free and fair elections as a fundamental aspect of democracy. Articles 324 to 329 of the Constitution confer powers upon the ECI to conduct elections to the Parliament, state legislatures, and offices of the President and Vice-President. These provisions underscore the importance of electoral integrity and the role of independent institutions in upholding democratic principles.


Case Law:

The Supreme Court has previously addressed several petitions related to EVMs, acknowledging both the significance of electoral transparency and the challenges associated with technological advancements. In past cases, the court has emphasized the need for robust safeguards to prevent tampering or manipulation of EVMs. Notably, in a recent case, the court rejected a petition alleging irregularities in the Election Commission's handling of EVM scrutiny, reaffirming its trust in the electoral process while underscoring the importance of due diligence.


Conclusion:

While concerns about the functioning of EVMs persist, the Supreme Court's decision not to entertain the recent petition reflects a broader judicial stance on electoral matters. The court's reluctance to intervene in every petition related to EVMs highlights the need for a balanced approach that addresses genuine concerns while maintaining confidence in the electoral process. As India prepares for future elections, ensuring transparency, accountability, and public trust in the electoral machinery remains paramount.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law