Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Kerala's Fiscal Autonomy in the Face of Central Oversight

Kerala's Fiscal Autonomy in the Face of Central Oversight



Introduction:

The recent developments regarding the Central Government's decision to allow Kerala to borrow Rs 5,000 crores, subject to conditions, have stirred discussions both in legal circles and among policymakers. This move, highlighted in a recent Supreme Court hearing, brings to light the intricate dynamics between the Centre and the states, particularly concerning fiscal autonomy and financial management.


Legal Aspect:

The legal aspect of this issue revolves around constitutional provisions and existing laws governing the fiscal relationship between the Central Government and the states. Article 293 of the Constitution grants states the power to borrow on the security or guarantee of the Consolidated Fund of the State. However, the recent dispute between Kerala and the Centre stems from alleged interference by the latter in the former's financial matters.


Centre's Assertion:

The Centre's assertion that Kerala's financial health has been a cause for concern, backed by observations from the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), underscores the complexities involved. Kerala's petition against the Centre's alleged interference brings into focus the delicate balance between fiscal autonomy and centralized control.


Legal Debate:

At the heart of this legal debate lies the interpretation of constitutional provisions guaranteeing states' fiscal autonomy and the Centre's responsibility to maintain financial discipline at the national level. Case laws and precedents related to similar disputes between states and the Centre could provide insights into the potential outcomes of this legal battle.


Supreme Court Intervention:

Moreover, the Supreme Court's role in mediating between the Centre and Kerala reflects the judiciary's crucial role in upholding constitutional principles and ensuring justice. The court's suggestion for negotiations underscores the importance of amicable resolution mechanisms in resolving disputes of national significance.


Implications and Conclusion:

As the legal proceedings unfold, stakeholders across the political spectrum await the outcome with bated breath. The implications of this case extend beyond Kerala, setting precedents for the fiscal relationship between the Centre and all states. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of federalism and cooperative federalism in India's governance framework.


In Conclusion:

In conclusion, the dispute between Kerala and the Centre over borrowing rights underscores the intricate interplay between constitutional provisions, legal interpretations, and political dynamics. The Supreme Court's intervention and subsequent legal proceedings will likely shape the future course of fiscal relations between the Centre and the states, impacting India's federal structure and governance paradigm.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more