Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Controversy Over Saudi Arabia's Chairmanship of UN Women's Rights Forum

Controversy Over Saudi Arabia's Chairmanship of UN Women's Rights Forum



Introduction


Saudi Arabia's recent appointment as chair of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) has sparked controversy and drawn criticism from women's rights advocates. Despite being unanimously elected, concerns have been raised due to Saudi Arabia's track record on women's rights.


Criticism from Human Rights Advocates


Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have both voiced reservations about Saudi Arabia's appointment, citing the kingdom's treatment of women and its systematic discrimination against them. The decision has been viewed as contradictory to the CSW's mandate to promote women's rights and gender equality.


Call for Action from Advocacy Groups


Sherine Tadros, Deputy Director for Advocacy at Amnesty International, underscored the gap between Saudi Arabia's record and the commission's objectives. Tadros emphasized that Saudi Arabia must prove its commitment to women's rights through tangible actions rather than mere symbolic gestures.


Saudi Arabia's Defense and Vision


Despite facing criticism, Saudi Arabia has defended its appointment, expressing eagerness to collaborate with the CSW to enhance women's rights. The kingdom has highlighted its "Saudi Vision 2030," which aims for women's full participation in society and emphasizes investing in their capabilities.


Complexities in Promoting Women's Rights


The controversy surrounding Saudi Arabia's appointment highlights the complexities and challenges involved in promoting women's rights globally. While the CSW plays a crucial role in advancing gender equality, the appointment of Saudi Arabia raises questions about the alignment of leadership roles with genuine commitments to women's empowerment.


Legal and Constitutional Context


Saudi Arabia has implemented various reforms in recent years aimed at improving women's rights, such as lifting the ban on women driving and allowing them to travel without male guardianship. However, significant restrictions and discrimination against women persist, indicating ongoing challenges in achieving gender equality within the kingdom.


Implications for Global Discourse


Although there are no specific case laws mentioned in the article, the controversy surrounding Saudi Arabia's appointment may prompt further discussions and debates within the international community regarding the promotion and protection of women's rights on a global scale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more