Arvind Kejriwal's Move Against ED Arrest
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Arvind Kejriwal's Move Against ED Arrest
Arvind Kejriwal's Appeal to the Supreme Court:
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the Delhi excise policy case prompted him to seek recourse from the Supreme Court. However, no special hearing was convened late at night to address his plea.
Absence of Special Bench:
Sources revealed that there was no special bench set up on Thursday night to address Arvind Kejriwal's plea against his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate.
Legal Action in the Supreme Court:
Addressing the media, Delhi Minister and AAP leader Atishi announced the filing of an application in the Supreme Court against Arvind Kejriwal's "illegal" arrest. She expressed hope that the Supreme Court would safeguard democracy in this matter.
Questioning the Timing:
Atishi questioned the timing of Kejriwal's arrest, highlighting the lack of any substantial findings in the two-year investigation conducted by the CBI and ED. She suggested that the timing of the arrest, just after the announcement of the Lok Sabha elections, was politically motivated.
Assault on Democracy:
Describing Kejriwal's arrest as an assault on democracy, Atishi emphasized that it aimed to suppress a prominent opposition leader ahead of the upcoming elections. She suggested that the BJP perceived Kejriwal as a significant challenger to PM Modi.
Enforcement Directorate's Action:
A team from the Enforcement Directorate arrived at Kejriwal's residence to interrogate him regarding the liquor policy case. Subsequently, amidst dramatic circumstances, Kejriwal was arrested when he failed to obtain interim protection from arrest from the Delhi High Court.
Legal Context:
The case highlights the legal battles and political tensions surrounding high-profile arrests. It underscores the role of the judiciary in upholding democratic principles and protecting individual rights, especially during politically sensitive periods like elections.
Constitutional Provisions:
The case raises questions about the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. It underscores the importance of due process and legal safeguards in preserving democratic values.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment