Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Allegations of Corruption: Arvind Kejriwal's Legal Battle with the ED

Allegations of Corruption: Arvind Kejriwal's Legal Battle with the ED



Allegations by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED)


The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has made serious allegations against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, claiming that the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) was the major beneficiary of proceeds of crime in the alleged excise policy scam. Kejriwal was remanded to ED custody until March 28 by Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court in connection with the money laundering case related to the scam.


Accusations of Benefit to AAP


According to the remand note submitted by the ED, the AAP allegedly benefitted from the proceeds of crime generated in the Delhi liquor scam, with part of the funds being used in the party's election campaign during the Goa Assembly elections in 2022. The agency further accused Kejriwal of being directly involved in formulating the excise policy and conspiring to favor certain private individuals in exchange for kickbacks.


Direct Involvement of Arvind Kejriwal


The ED asserted that Kejriwal's actions, including his involvement in policy formulation and utilization of proceeds of crime in the AAP's election campaign, were carried out with his knowledge and active collusion. Kejriwal's arrest by the central agency came after he failed to appear before it despite multiple summonses, citing them as "illegal."


Legal and Governance Implications


The case revolves around alleged irregularities and money laundering in framing and implementing the Delhi Excise Policy 2022, which was subsequently annulled. While Kejriwal was not initially named in the FIRs filed by the ED or the CBI in the case, his name emerged in the ED's chargesheet, where the agency claimed he communicated with one of the main accused, Sameer Mahendru, and instructed him to continue working with co-accused Vijay Nair, AAP's communications-in-charge.


Legal Framework and Constitutional Provisions


This development raises legal questions concerning corruption allegations against public officials, money laundering, and the misuse of public office for personal gain. It also underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in governance, as well as the need for a fair and impartial investigation process to uphold the rule of law.


Considerations of Precedent


The case may involve various laws related to corruption, money laundering, and electoral offenses, with constitutional provisions related to accountability and due process being crucial in ensuring justice. Additionally, previous case laws involving similar allegations of corruption and misuse of public office may provide precedent in interpreting and adjudicating the present case.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more