Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Exploring Article 376 of the Indian Constitution: Implications and Case Law Analysis

Exploring Article 376 of the Indian Constitution: Implications and Case Law Analysis

Exploring Article 376 of the Indian Constitution: Implications and Case Law Analysis



Article 376 of the Indian Constitution deals with the provisions regarding the expiration of the term of the House of the People (Lok Sabha) and the dissolution of the House by the President. This article plays a significant role in the functioning of India's parliamentary democracy. Let's delve deeper into its implications and analyze relevant case laws in the context of the modern era.


Understanding Article 376:


Article 376 states:


"The House of the People shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer: Provided that the said period may, while a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, be extended by Parliament by law for a period not exceeding one year at a time and not extending in any case beyond a period of six months after the Proclamation has ceased to operate."


This provision essentially outlines the duration for which the House of the People, i.e., the Lok Sabha, remains in session. It specifies that the Lok Sabha shall continue for five years from the date of its first meeting, with provisions for extension during a Proclamation of Emergency.


Implications in the Modern Era:


1. Stability in Governance:

   - Article 376 provides stability to the parliamentary system by specifying the tenure of the Lok Sabha, ensuring continuity in governance and policy-making processes.


2. Emergency Provisions:

   - The provision allows for the extension of the Lok Sabha's term during a Proclamation of Emergency, providing flexibility to address extraordinary situations while upholding democratic principles.


3. Constitutional Checks and Balances:

   - Article 376 underscores the importance of constitutional mechanisms in ensuring accountability and adherence to democratic norms within the parliamentary framework.


Case Law Analysis:


1. Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Raj Narain (1975):

   - In this landmark case, the Supreme Court addressed the dissolution of the Lok Sabha following the declaration of Emergency in 1975. The court upheld the government's decision to dissolve the Lok Sabha and order fresh elections, emphasizing the executive's authority in such matters.


2. Raja Ram Pal vs. Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007):

   - This case dealt with the disqualification of certain Members of Parliament (MPs) for their involvement in the cash-for-query scandal. The Supreme Court ruled that the Speaker of the Lok Sabha has the authority to disqualify MPs, highlighting the importance of upholding integrity and ethical conduct in parliamentary proceedings.


Contemporary Relevance:


1. Technological Advancements:

   - In the digital age, advancements in technology have facilitated greater transparency and accountability in parliamentary proceedings, enhancing public participation and scrutiny.


2. Role of Social Media:

   - Social media platforms have emerged as powerful tools for political communication and engagement, influencing public discourse and shaping public opinion on parliamentary matters.


Conclusion:


Article 376 of the Indian Constitution serves as a cornerstone of India's parliamentary democracy, providing clarity on the duration of the Lok Sabha's tenure and mechanisms for extension during emergencies. Through a nuanced understanding of this provision and its application in relevant case laws, India can continue to strengthen its democratic institutions and uphold constitutional values in the modern era.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more