Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Delhi High Court Rejects Mahua Moitra's Plea for Media Gag in ED Investigation Case

Delhi High Court Rejects Mahua Moitra's Plea for Media Gag in ED Investigation Case




The Delhi High Court recently delivered a verdict dismissing the plea filed by Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra, seeking to restrain the Enforcement Directorate (ED) from disclosing any "confidential or unverified information" to the media regarding an investigation under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against her.


In its ruling, the Delhi HC emphasized that it meticulously reviewed various news articles submitted as evidence in the petition. The court concluded that these articles solely reported on the ongoing investigation against Moitra, a public figure, without delving into her private life. Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the bench, highlighted that the media coverage did not infringe upon Moitra's privacy rights or compromise the impartiality of the investigation or potential trial proceedings.


The plea alleged that the ED had intentionally and maliciously leaked details of FEMA summons and Moitra's response to them, along with sensitive information regarding the allegations under investigation. Moitra contended that the ED's actions aimed to subject her to a trial by the media, tarnishing her reputation and prejudicing the investigation.


Constitutional Provisions and Laws:

1. Right to Privacy: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to privacy as a fundamental right, ensuring protection against unwarranted intrusion into one's personal life.

2. Freedom of Press: Article 19(1)(a) guarantees the freedom of speech and expression, including freedom of the press, subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty, security, and public order.

3. Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA): FEMA regulates foreign exchange transactions in India and empowers authorities like the ED to investigate violations and enforce compliance.


Case Laws and Judgments:

- Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court affirmed the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21, emphasizing its intrinsic value in safeguarding personal autonomy and dignity.

- Sakal Papers v. Union of India (1962): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the freedom of the press as essential for democracy but recognized the state's authority to impose reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order.


Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Delhi High Court's decision underscores the delicate balance between freedom of the press and individual privacy rights, particularly in high-profile investigations involving public figures. While upholding the principles of transparency and accountability, the court also ensures fair treatment and due process for the petitioner.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more