Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Delhi High Court Imposes Costs on Impersonator Seeking VIP Treatment: Legal Ramifications and Judicial Ruling

Delhi High Court Imposes Costs on Impersonator Seeking VIP Treatment: Legal Ramifications and Judicial Ruling

                                 

The recent ruling by the Delhi High Court, imposing costs of Rs 35,000 on an individual who impersonated a PMO official to obtain VIP privileges at temples, government accommodations, and transportation, sheds light on the legal consequences of such actions. The case, involving charges of criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and cheating, underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and preserving the integrity of public institutions.


Legal Proceedings and Judicial Decision:

The accused, Vivek Keshawn, had challenged the charges framed against him by a CBI court under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 419 (impersonation), and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). However, Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi High Court dismissed Keshawn's petition, finding no merit in his arguments. Consequently, the court ordered Keshawn to pay costs of Rs 35,000 to be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority within two weeks.


Utilization of Legal Costs:

Importantly, the High Court directed that the costs deposited by Keshawn shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority to provide counseling and psychological support to victims under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. This decision underscores the judiciary's commitment to addressing the needs of vulnerable individuals and ensuring access to justice.


Constitutional Provisions and Laws:

The case implicates several constitutional provisions and legal statutes, including:

- Right to Equality: Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws, emphasizing fairness and non-discrimination in legal proceedings.

-  Criminal Offenses: Sections 120B, 419, and 420 of the IPC deal with criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and cheating, respectively, providing legal frameworks for prosecuting such offenses.


Relevant Case Law:

- State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful Desai (2003): In this case, the Supreme Court emphasized the seriousness of impersonation and its adverse impact on public trust and institutional integrity.


Facts of the Case:

The allegations against Keshawn and another individual, Pramod Kumar Singh, involved posing as officials from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and making fraudulent calls to officials at Pondicherry and Andhra Pradesh's Tirumala Tirupati Devsthanam Board. Singh, impersonating the Principal Secretary at PMO, requested government accommodations, vehicles, and VIP darshan (sightseeing) at temples for both himself and Keshawn.


In defense, Keshawn denied involvement in the alleged impersonation scheme, claiming that Singh had mistakenly used his name and phone number without his knowledge or consent.


Conclusion:

The Delhi High Court's ruling serves as a reminder of the legal consequences of impersonation and fraudulent conduct, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal principles and accountability for one's actions. Additionally, the directive to utilize legal costs for supporting victims underlines the judiciary's commitment to holistic justice and victim rehabilitation.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more