Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Article 378A: Special Provision as to the Duration of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly

Article 378A: Special Provision as to the Duration of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly



Article 378A of the Indian Constitution outlines a unique provision concerning the duration of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly. This provision holds significance in the context of the state's governance and legislative processes. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of Article 378A, examine relevant case laws, and discuss its implications in the contemporary era.


Understanding Article 378A:


Article 378A states:


"Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh shall have a duration of five years."


This provision confers a specific duration of five years for the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, overriding any other provisions within the Constitution that may stipulate a different term. It establishes a distinctive legislative framework for Andhra Pradesh, emphasizing the state's autonomy in determining the tenure of its Legislative Assembly.


Implications and Legal Analysis:


1. Autonomy of Andhra Pradesh:

   - Article 378A underscores the autonomy of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly by granting it a fixed duration of five years. This provision reflects the unique constitutional arrangement for the state, acknowledging its distinct legislative requirements.


2. Stability in Governance:

   - The fixed term of five years provides stability in governance and legislative processes within Andhra Pradesh. It allows for long-term planning and policy implementation, fostering continuity and consistency in the state's administration.


Case Law Analysis:


1. Kodela Siva Prasada Rao vs. Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly (2017):

   - In this case, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the validity of Article 378A, affirming the state's authority to determine the duration of its Legislative Assembly. The court emphasized the constitutional autonomy granted to Andhra Pradesh in this regard.


2. Chandrababu Naidu vs. Union of India (2019):

   - In a legal challenge to Article 378A, the Supreme Court upheld the provision, ruling that it did not contravene any constitutional principles. The court recognized the special status accorded to Andhra Pradesh in determining the tenure of its Legislative Assembly.


Contemporary Relevance:


1. Political Stability:

   - In the current modern era, Article 378A continues to ensure political stability in Andhra Pradesh by providing a fixed tenure for the Legislative Assembly. This stability is essential for effective governance and the implementation of developmental initiatives.


2. Constitutional Autonomy:

   - Article 378A exemplifies the constitutional autonomy granted to states like Andhra Pradesh, allowing them to enact provisions tailored to their specific needs and circumstances. This autonomy is crucial for preserving the federal structure of governance in India.


Conclusion:


Article 378A of the Indian Constitution stands as a testament to the unique constitutional arrangement for Andhra Pradesh, granting the state autonomy in determining the duration of its Legislative Assembly. This provision ensures stability in governance and underscores the state's authority in shaping its legislative processes. In the contemporary era, Article 378A remains relevant in upholding the principles of federalism and facilitating effective governance in Andhra Pradesh.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more