Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Andhra Pradesh Assembly Speaker Acts Against MLAs for Party Defection

Andhra Pradesh Assembly Speaker Acts Against 

MLAs for Party Defection



In recent news from Andhra Pradesh, Legislative Assembly Speaker Tammineni Sitaram has taken decisive action against party defection by disqualifying eight Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs). This development, prompted by petitions from the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP) and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), highlights the seriousness of party defection and its impact on democratic governance.

Implications of Disqualification

The disqualification of MLAs like Anam Ramanarayana Reddy, Mekapati Chandrasekhar Reddy, Kotam Reddy Sridhar Reddy, and Undavalli Sridevi underscores the Speaker's commitment to upholding party discipline and safeguarding the democratic process. Party defection, where elected representatives switch allegiance from one political party to another, undermines democratic norms and erodes public trust in elected officials.

Legal Framework

The decision to disqualify the MLAs was made in line with relevant constitutional provisions and laws governing legislative bodies in India. Article 191 of the Indian Constitution and the Tenth Schedule, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, provide the legal framework for addressing instances of party defection. These provisions allow for the disqualification of elected members who voluntarily give up party membership or defy party directives.

Process and Evidence

The disqualification process involved a thorough examination of petitions filed by the YSRCP and TDP, which presented evidence of party defection and violations of party discipline. The Speaker's decision aligns with precedents set by previous judgments and case laws related to party defection, ensuring transparency and accountability in the process.

Judicial Precedents

In the case of Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu and Others (1992), the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality of the Anti-Defection Law, emphasizing the need to preserve the integrity of political parties and prevent opportunistic defections. The court ruled that the Speaker's decisions on disqualification are subject to judicial review, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles.

Speaker's Role

The disqualification of the eight MLAs underscores the Speaker's role as a neutral arbiter tasked with upholding democratic principles and ensuring the smooth functioning of legislative bodies. The decision serves as a deterrent against party defection and reaffirms the importance of party discipline in India's political landscape.

Political Fallout

As the political repercussions of these disqualifications unfold, discussions within political circles will likely focus on the implications for the balance of power in the Assembly and the potential for by-elections to fill the vacant seats. However, the overarching message remains clear: adherence to party discipline and respect for democratic norms are essential for the effective functioning of India's democracy.
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more