Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

The New Hit and Run Law in India: Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Evolution of Penal Code

The New Hit and Run Law in India: Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Evolution of Penal Code



Introduction:


In a significant development within the Indian legal landscape, the enactment of the New Hit and Run Law under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita has brought forth crucial changes to the existing framework outlined in the Indian Penal Code. This article aims to delve into the specifics of the new legislation, its alignment with established legal principles, and the potential impact on contemporary jurisprudence.


The New Hit and Run Law:


The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, a comprehensive legal code, introduced a revamped framework for addressing hit and run cases in India. Under this legislation, the term "hit and run" pertains to accidents where a driver involved in a collision fails to stop and provide necessary information or assistance.


Key Changes and Provisions:


1. Strict Penalties:

   The new law imposes stringent penalties on individuals found guilty of hit and run offenses. These penalties are designed to serve as a deterrent, reflecting society's emphasis on accountability and responsibility.


2. Enhanced Definition:

   The legislation expands and refines the definition of hit and run incidents, encompassing a broader range of scenarios. This ensures that the law remains relevant and adaptable to evolving circumstances.


3. Victim-Centric Approach:

   There is a notable shift towards a victim-centric approach, emphasizing the rights and well-being of those affected by hit and run accidents. The legislation prioritizes the provision of immediate medical assistance and necessitates the reporting of incidents promptly.


Landmark Judgments and Case Laws:


1. State of Maharashtra v. Salman Khan (2015):

   In this high-profile case, Bollywood actor Salman Khan was convicted of a hit and run incident that occurred in 2002. The case underscored the need for stringent laws and effective enforcement to address such offenses.


2. Amit Vashisth v. State (2020):

   This case highlighted the challenges in identifying hit and run culprits when there are no eyewitnesses. The judiciary, in its ruling, emphasized the importance of forensic evidence and technological advancements in solving such cases.


Pros and Cons:


Pros:


1. Deterrence and Accountability:

   The stringent penalties act as a deterrent, potentially reducing the occurrence of hit and run incidents. This aligns with the overarching goal of promoting responsible driving.


2. Enhanced Victim Protection:

   The victim-centric approach ensures that the rights and needs of those affected are at the forefront, fostering a sense of justice and support.


Cons:


1. Challenges in Implementation:

   Enforcing the new law may present challenges, particularly in instances where identifying the responsible party is complex. Adequate resources and technological infrastructure are crucial for effective implementation.


2. Potential for Misuse:

   There is a concern that the strict penalties might be misused or lead to unjust consequences, especially in situations where drivers may be wrongfully accused.


Conclusion:


The introduction of the New Hit and Run Law under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita marks a significant step towards enhancing road safety and ensuring justice for victims. As the legal fraternity grapples with the nuances of this legislation, landmark judgments like Salman Khan's case and ongoing debates will shape its effectiveness and relevance in the years to come.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more