Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

The New Hit and Run Law in India: Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Evolution of Penal Code

The New Hit and Run Law in India: Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Evolution of Penal Code



Introduction:


In a significant development within the Indian legal landscape, the enactment of the New Hit and Run Law under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita has brought forth crucial changes to the existing framework outlined in the Indian Penal Code. This article aims to delve into the specifics of the new legislation, its alignment with established legal principles, and the potential impact on contemporary jurisprudence.


The New Hit and Run Law:


The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, a comprehensive legal code, introduced a revamped framework for addressing hit and run cases in India. Under this legislation, the term "hit and run" pertains to accidents where a driver involved in a collision fails to stop and provide necessary information or assistance.


Key Changes and Provisions:


1. Strict Penalties:

   The new law imposes stringent penalties on individuals found guilty of hit and run offenses. These penalties are designed to serve as a deterrent, reflecting society's emphasis on accountability and responsibility.


2. Enhanced Definition:

   The legislation expands and refines the definition of hit and run incidents, encompassing a broader range of scenarios. This ensures that the law remains relevant and adaptable to evolving circumstances.


3. Victim-Centric Approach:

   There is a notable shift towards a victim-centric approach, emphasizing the rights and well-being of those affected by hit and run accidents. The legislation prioritizes the provision of immediate medical assistance and necessitates the reporting of incidents promptly.


Landmark Judgments and Case Laws:


1. State of Maharashtra v. Salman Khan (2015):

   In this high-profile case, Bollywood actor Salman Khan was convicted of a hit and run incident that occurred in 2002. The case underscored the need for stringent laws and effective enforcement to address such offenses.


2. Amit Vashisth v. State (2020):

   This case highlighted the challenges in identifying hit and run culprits when there are no eyewitnesses. The judiciary, in its ruling, emphasized the importance of forensic evidence and technological advancements in solving such cases.


Pros and Cons:


Pros:


1. Deterrence and Accountability:

   The stringent penalties act as a deterrent, potentially reducing the occurrence of hit and run incidents. This aligns with the overarching goal of promoting responsible driving.


2. Enhanced Victim Protection:

   The victim-centric approach ensures that the rights and needs of those affected are at the forefront, fostering a sense of justice and support.


Cons:


1. Challenges in Implementation:

   Enforcing the new law may present challenges, particularly in instances where identifying the responsible party is complex. Adequate resources and technological infrastructure are crucial for effective implementation.


2. Potential for Misuse:

   There is a concern that the strict penalties might be misused or lead to unjust consequences, especially in situations where drivers may be wrongfully accused.


Conclusion:


The introduction of the New Hit and Run Law under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita marks a significant step towards enhancing road safety and ensuring justice for victims. As the legal fraternity grapples with the nuances of this legislation, landmark judgments like Salman Khan's case and ongoing debates will shape its effectiveness and relevance in the years to come.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more