Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Ensuring Fairness and Efficiency: A Discussion on Articles 315 to 323 of the Indian Constitution with Case Law Insights

Ensuring Fairness and Efficiency: A Discussion on Articles 315 to 323 of the Indian Constitution with Case Law Insights



Articles 315 to 323 of the Indian Constitution establish the framework for Public Service Commissions (PSCs) and Administrative Tribunals. These constitutional provisions play a crucial role in ensuring the impartiality and efficiency of public administration. In the contemporary era, marked by administrative complexities and legal challenges, these articles remain foundational. This article delves into the constitutional nuances, explores relevant case laws, and analyzes the ongoing relevance of these provisions in the current administrative and legal landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 315: Establishes Public Service Commissions for the Union and the States.


- Article 316: Deals with the appointment and term of office of members of Public Service Commissions.


- Article 317: Provides for the removal and suspension of members of Public Service Commissions.


- Article 318: Grants power to the President or Governor to make regulations regarding the conditions of service of members and staff of Public Service Commissions.


- Article 319: Contains provisions for the dismissal or removal of members of Public Service Commissions.


- Article 320: Enumerates the functions of Public Service Commissions.


- Article 321: Empowers the Parliament to establish Administrative Tribunals for adjudicating disputes and complaints regarding recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services.


- Article 322: Grants power to the Parliament to determine the jurisdiction and powers of Administrative Tribunals.


- Article 323A: Allows the Parliament to provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints regarding recruitment and conditions of service.


- Article 323B: Authorizes the States to establish Tribunals for similar purposes.


Contemporary Significance:


In the current administrative and legal landscape, Articles 315 to 323 are vital for ensuring the fairness and efficiency of public administration. These provisions establish mechanisms for the resolution of disputes and complaints related to recruitment and service conditions.


Relevant Case Laws:


S. L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan (1980):


This case emphasized the role of Public Service Commissions in maintaining the integrity and fairness of recruitment processes. The Supreme Court stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional provisions to avoid arbitrariness and favoritism.


L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997):


In this landmark case, the Supreme Court declared that the power of judicial review over the decisions of Administrative Tribunals is an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The judgment clarified the constitutional framework governing Administrative Tribunals.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Role of Public Service Commissions:

   - Articles 315 to 320 delineate the establishment, composition, functions, and conditions of service of Public Service Commissions, ensuring their independence and effectiveness.


2. Creation of Administrative Tribunals:

   - Articles 321 to 323B establish the constitutional foundation for the creation of Administrative Tribunals, providing an alternative forum for the adjudication of disputes related to public service.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Ensuring Independence of Commissions:

   - The challenge lies in ensuring the independence of Public Service Commissions, free from external influences, to maintain the integrity of the recruitment process.


2. Efficiency of Administrative Tribunals:

   - Balancing the need for expeditious resolution of disputes with the requirement of fairness in Administrative Tribunals poses a continuous challenge.


Contemporary Administrative Dynamics:


As the demands on public administration evolve, the mechanisms established by these articles need to adapt to ensure that they remain effective and capable of meeting the challenges of a modern, dynamic society.


Conclusion:


Articles 315 to 323 of the Indian Constitution lay the foundation for the fair and efficient functioning of public administration. Relevant case laws, such as S. L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan and L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, have shaped the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where administrative challenges are multifaceted, these articles remain indispensable in upholding the principles of fairness, efficiency, and justice in public service.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law