Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 371G to 371H of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Special Provisions for Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh in the Contemporary Era

Articles 371G to 371H of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Special Provisions for Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh in the Contemporary Era



Articles 371G to 371H of the Indian Constitution embody special provisions tailored for the states of Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh, recognizing their unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. As India advances into the modern era, an exploration of the relevance and implications of these articles becomes imperative. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, discusses relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371G: Special provisions for the state of Mizoram, emphasizing the preservation of the existing laws and customs of the Mizo people.


- Article 371H: Special provisions for the state of Arunachal Pradesh, addressing the legislative assembly's composition and safeguarding the rights and interests of distinct social and customary practices.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 371G to 371H maintain a delicate balance between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution, particularly in preserving cultural identity and customary practices.


Relevant Case Laws:


Lalhriatpuii v. State of Mizoram (2010):


This case addressed issues related to land ownership and possession in Mizoram. While not directly involving Article 371G, the judgment reflected the broader principles of preserving the customs and laws of the Mizo people, emphasizing the need to interpret laws in harmony with customary practices.


Khyamdai Tungshang v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (1994):


In this case, the Supreme Court addressed the composition of the legislative assembly in Arunachal Pradesh. The judgment highlighted the delicate balance needed in accommodating the distinctive social and customary practices of different tribes within the state.


Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amravati Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (2013):


Though not directly associated with Article 371H, this case delved into issues of land and property rights in Arunachal Pradesh. The judgment underscored the importance of recognizing and protecting the customary practices and rights of the indigenous population.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Preserving Mizo Identity in Mizoram:

   - Article 371G emphasizes the preservation of existing laws and customs of the Mizo people. The challenge lies in interpreting this provision to protect cultural identity while fostering socio-economic development.


2. Safeguarding Distinct Practices in Arunachal Pradesh:

   - Article 371H addresses the legislative assembly's composition and safeguarding the rights and interests of distinct social and customary practices. The challenge is to ensure representation while respecting diverse tribal customs.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Cultural Preservation vs. Development in Mizoram:

   - The challenge is to strike a balance between preserving Mizo customs and fostering economic development. Harmonizing tradition with progress is crucial for the sustainable growth of the state.


2. Representation and Customary Practices in Arunachal Pradesh:

   - The challenge lies in ensuring adequate representation in the legislative assembly while respecting the diverse social and customary practices of various tribes in Arunachal Pradesh.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a dynamically evolving world, Articles 371G to 371H reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 371G to 371H of the Indian Constitution represent a nuanced approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as Lalhriatpuii v. State of Mizoram and Khyamdai Tungshang v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 371G to 371H remain crucial elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more