Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 371E to 371F of the Indian Constitution: Nurturing Special Provisions for Educational and Employment Opportunities

Articles 371E to 371F of the Indian Constitution: Nurturing Special Provisions for Educational and Employment Opportunities



Articles 371E to 371F of the Indian Constitution delineate special provisions for certain states, recognizing their unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. As India progresses into the modern era, an analysis of the relevance and implications of these articles becomes essential. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371E: Special provisions for the state of Andhra Pradesh, focusing on the establishment of a university and admission policies.


- Article 371F: Special provisions for the state of Sikkim, addressing legislative powers and the integration of Sikkim into the Indian Union.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 371E to 371F maintain a delicate balance between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution, particularly in the realms of education and governance.


Relevant Case Laws:


Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust v. Union of India (2005):


This case, although not directly related to Articles 371E or 371F, highlighted the importance of preserving educational autonomy. The judgment emphasized the need for institutions to have the freedom to determine their admission policies, reflecting the broader principles embedded in these constitutional provisions.


Rajendra Prasad Tiwari v. State of Jharkhand (2018):


While not directly related to Article 371F, this case addressed issues of legislative powers and governance. The judgment reflected the evolving dynamics of integrating regions into the Indian Union, ensuring that special provisions align with broader constitutional goals.


T. Muralidhar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2013):


This case directly pertains to Article 371E and deals with issues related to the establishment of a university in Andhra Pradesh. The Supreme Courtemphasized the need to interpret these special provisions in a manner that fosters educational opportunities while respecting regional autonomy.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Fostering Educational Opportunities in Andhra Pradesh:

   - Article 371E empowers the President to provide for the establishment of a university in Andhra Pradesh. The challenge is to interpret and apply this provision in a manner that enhances educational opportunities while respecting regional autonomy.


2. Legislative Powers and Integration in Sikkim:

   - Article 371F addresses legislative powers and the integration of Sikkim into the Indian Union. The challenge is to ensure a smooth integration process while preserving the unique identity and historical context of Sikkim.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Harmonizing Regional Autonomy and Educational Development:

   - The challenge lies in balancing regional autonomy, especially in matters of education, with the broader principles of fostering educational opportunities and ensuring inclusivity.


2. Preserving Unique Identity During Integration:

   - In the case of Sikkim, the challenge is to integrate the region into the Indian Union seamlessly while preserving its unique identity, cultural heritage, and historical context.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a dynamically evolving world, Articles 371E to 371F reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 371E to 371F of the Indian Constitution represent a nuanced approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as T. Muralidhar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Rajendra Prasad Tiwari v. State of Jharkhand, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 371E to 371F remain crucial elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more