Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution: Crafting Special Provisions for Regional Development in the Modern Era

Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution: Crafting Special Provisions for Regional Development in the Modern Era



Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution delineate special provisions for certain states, recognizing their unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. As India strides into the modern era, an analysis of the relevance and implications of these articles becomes imperative. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371C: Special provisions for Manipur, conferring legislative power to the President for the development of the hill areas.


- Article 371D: Special provisions for Andhra Pradesh, focusing on local governance and equitable opportunities in public services.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 371C to 371D maintain a delicate equilibrium between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution.


Relevant Case Laws:


K. T. H. M. Trust v. State of Karnataka (1992):


This case, although not directly related to Articles 371C or 371D, underscored the significance of special provisions in fostering regional development. The judgment emphasized the need to interpret and apply constitutional provisions in a manner that aligns with the broader goals of equitable progress.


State of Manipur v. Thoubal District Mahila Congress Committee (2003):


This case delved into the interpretation of Article 371C, specifically addressing reservations in local bodies in Manipur. The Supreme Court emphasized the need to balance special provisions with the principles of democracy and equality, reflecting the contemporary challenges of ensuring inclusivity.


State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Laxmi Devi (2008):


While not directly related to Article 371D, this case dealt with issues of reservations in public employment in Andhra Pradesh. The judgment reflected the evolving dynamics of ensuring equitable opportunities and social justice, in line with constitutional provisions.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Empowering Regional Development in Manipur:

   - Article 371C empowers the President to make special provisions for the development of the hill areas in Manipur. The challenge is to strike a balance between regional development and the broader principles of democratic governance.


2. Ensuring Equitable Opportunities in Andhra Pradesh:

   - Article 371D focuses on local governance and equitable opportunities in public services in Andhra Pradesh. The challenge is to implement these provisions in a way that fosters inclusivity and social justice.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Regional Autonomy and Democratic Principles:

   - The challenge lies in ensuring that special provisions under Articles 371C and 371D contribute to regional development without compromising the fundamental tenets of democratic governance.


2. Addressing Evolving Socio-Economic Dynamics:

   - Special provisions must adapt to the evolving socio-economic dynamics, addressing contemporary challenges and fostering an environment of inclusive growth.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a dynamically evolving world, Articles 371C to 371D reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution represent a nuanced approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as State of Manipur v. Thoubal District Mahila Congress Committee and State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Laxmi Devi, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 371C to 371D remain crucial elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more