Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution: Crafting Special Provisions for Regional Development in the Modern Era

Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution: Crafting Special Provisions for Regional Development in the Modern Era



Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution delineate special provisions for certain states, recognizing their unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. As India strides into the modern era, an analysis of the relevance and implications of these articles becomes imperative. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371C: Special provisions for Manipur, conferring legislative power to the President for the development of the hill areas.


- Article 371D: Special provisions for Andhra Pradesh, focusing on local governance and equitable opportunities in public services.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 371C to 371D maintain a delicate equilibrium between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution.


Relevant Case Laws:


K. T. H. M. Trust v. State of Karnataka (1992):


This case, although not directly related to Articles 371C or 371D, underscored the significance of special provisions in fostering regional development. The judgment emphasized the need to interpret and apply constitutional provisions in a manner that aligns with the broader goals of equitable progress.


State of Manipur v. Thoubal District Mahila Congress Committee (2003):


This case delved into the interpretation of Article 371C, specifically addressing reservations in local bodies in Manipur. The Supreme Court emphasized the need to balance special provisions with the principles of democracy and equality, reflecting the contemporary challenges of ensuring inclusivity.


State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Laxmi Devi (2008):


While not directly related to Article 371D, this case dealt with issues of reservations in public employment in Andhra Pradesh. The judgment reflected the evolving dynamics of ensuring equitable opportunities and social justice, in line with constitutional provisions.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Empowering Regional Development in Manipur:

   - Article 371C empowers the President to make special provisions for the development of the hill areas in Manipur. The challenge is to strike a balance between regional development and the broader principles of democratic governance.


2. Ensuring Equitable Opportunities in Andhra Pradesh:

   - Article 371D focuses on local governance and equitable opportunities in public services in Andhra Pradesh. The challenge is to implement these provisions in a way that fosters inclusivity and social justice.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Regional Autonomy and Democratic Principles:

   - The challenge lies in ensuring that special provisions under Articles 371C and 371D contribute to regional development without compromising the fundamental tenets of democratic governance.


2. Addressing Evolving Socio-Economic Dynamics:

   - Special provisions must adapt to the evolving socio-economic dynamics, addressing contemporary challenges and fostering an environment of inclusive growth.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a dynamically evolving world, Articles 371C to 371D reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 371C to 371D of the Indian Constitution represent a nuanced approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as State of Manipur v. Thoubal District Mahila Congress Committee and State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Laxmi Devi, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 371C to 371D remain crucial elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more