Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 371A to 371B of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Regional Autonomy in the Contemporary Era

Articles 371A to 371B of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Regional Autonomy in the Contemporary Era



Articles 371A to 371B of the Indian Constitution bestow special provisions upon certain states, recognizing the unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts they embody. As India propels itself into the modern era, an examination of the relevance and implications of these articles becomes essential. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the current socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371A: Special provisions for Nagaland, addressing matters related to governance, laws, and customs.

  

- Article 371B: Special provisions for Assam, dealing with the legislative assembly's composition and regional autonomy.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 371A to 371B maintain a delicate balance between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution.


Relevant Case Laws:


State of Nagaland v. Ratan Singh (1967):


This case involved a challenge to the imposition of Assam Rifles Act in Nagaland. The Supreme Court upheld the special provisions under Article 371A, emphasizing the need to protect the customs, traditions, and social practices of the Naga people.


Dolphin Gogoi v. State of Assam (2011):


While not directly related to Article 371B, this case addressed the issue of reservations in the Assam Legislative Assembly. The judgment underscored the delicate balance required in ensuring fair representation while respecting regional autonomy.


Re: Special Courts Bill (1978):


This case is significant as it broadly discusses the constitutional validity of laws impacting states with special provisions, emphasizing the need for a careful examination of regional implications.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Special Provisions for Governance:

   - Article 371A grants special provisions for Nagaland, allowing for specific arrangements related to legislative power, local laws, and customary practices.

  

2. Legislative Autonomy for Assam:

   - Article 371B addresses the composition of the Assam Legislative Assembly, ensuring regional representation while recognizing the unique circumstances of the state.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Harmonizing Regional Autonomy with Constitutional Principles:

   - The challenge lies in striking a balance between preserving regional autonomy and upholding the fundamental principles of equality and justice embedded in the broader constitutional framework.


2. Ensuring Equitable Representation:

   - Special provisions should not hinder the principles of fair representation and inclusivity. The challenge is to find a middle ground that respects regional autonomy without compromising democratic ideals.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a dynamically evolving world, Articles 371A to 371B reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 371A to 371B of the Indian Constitution represent a nuanced approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as State of Nagaland v. Ratan Singh and Dolphin Gogoi v. State of Assam, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 371A to 371B remain crucial elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more