Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 369 to 370 of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Special Provisions in the Modern Era

Articles 369 to 370 of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Special Provisions in the Modern Era

Articles 369 to 370 of the Indian Constitution delineate special provisions for certain territories and regions, addressing unique historical, cultural, and geopolitical considerations. In the evolving socio-political landscape, these provisions have garnered attention and raised questions about their contemporary relevance. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding these articles in the current modern era.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 369: Provides temporary powers to the President to make adaptations and modifications to existing laws in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.


- Article 370: Grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, with specific provisions regarding its governance and relationship with the Union.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 369 to 370 represent a delicate balance between historical considerations and the imperative for a unified and coherent constitutional framework.


Relevant Case Laws:


State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Triloki Nath Khosa (1974):


This case dealt with the interpretation of Article 370. The Supreme Court clarified that Article 370 is a temporary provision and does not grant absolute autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir. The judgment emphasized the need to balance regional autonomy with the overarching principles of the Constitution.


Sampat Prakash v. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1970):


In this case, the Supreme Court held that the power of the President under Article 370 to modify laws should be exercised within the limits of the Constitution. This underscores the idea that even in special provisions, constitutional boundaries must be respected.


S. S. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967):


Although not directly related to Articles 369 to 370, this case marked a critical juncture by affirming the doctrine of prospective overruling. It laid the foundation for later judgments, including those related to special provisions.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Temporary Powers under Article 369:

   - Article 369 grants temporary powers to the President to make adaptations and modifications to laws in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The challenge is to ensure that these powers are exercised judiciously and within the constitutional framework.


2. Special Autonomous Status under Article 370:

   - Article 370 provides special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir, recognizing the unique historical context of its accession to the Union. The challenge lies in harmonizing this special status with the principles of equality and justice enshrined in the broader constitutional framework.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Harmonizing Regional Autonomy with Constitutional Principles:

   - The challenge is to strike a delicate balance between preserving regional autonomy, as envisaged in Articles 369 to 370, and upholding the fundamental principles of the Constitution.


2. Addressing Constitutional Ambiguities:

   - The evolving socio-political dynamics necessitate a nuanced approach in addressing constitutional ambiguities and ensuring that special provisions do not impede the broader goals of the Constitution.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a rapidly changing world, Articles 369 to 370 reflect the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Articles 369 to 370 of the Indian Constitution embody the complexities and nuances of special provisions for certain territories. The relevant case laws, such as State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Triloki Nath Khosa and Sampat Prakash v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Articles 369 to 370 remain essential elements in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more