Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution: Official Language of the Republic of India and Bilingual Legislatures

Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution: Official Language of the Republic of India and Bilingual Legislatures



Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution delineate provisions related to the official language of the Republic of India and the use of two languages, Hindi and English, in the proceedings of Parliament and state legislatures. In the contemporary era marked by linguistic diversity and the need for effective communication, these constitutional clauses play a pivotal role in balancing linguistic inclusivity and practical functionality. This article explores the constitutional intricacies, examines relevant case laws, and sheds light on the contemporary relevance of these provisions.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 348: Empowers the President to authorize the use of the Hindi language in addition to English for official purposes of the Union, including proceedings in Parliament.


- Article 349: Relates to the directive to promote the spread of the Hindi language and its enrichment, while safeguarding the features of the languages used in India.


- Article 350: Envisions the provision of facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 348 to 350 symbolize the constitutional commitment to linguistic diversity, providing a nuanced framework for the use of official languages and the promotion of linguistic inclusivity.


Relevant Case Law:


C.K. Daphtary v. O.P. Gupta (1971):


This case emphasized the importance of preserving linguistic diversity while highlighting the need for flexibility in language usage. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of English in courts is permissible to ensure justice, especially in states where English is not the official language.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Official Language of the Union:

   - Article 348 empowers the President to authorize the use of Hindi in addition to English for official purposes, ensuring flexibility and inclusivity.


2. Promotion of Hindi:

   - Article 349 directs the government to promote the spread and enrichment of the Hindi language while safeguarding linguistic diversity.


3. Education in Mother Tongue:

   - Article 350 underscores the importance of providing facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education, particularly for linguistic minority groups.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Linguistic Inclusivity:

   - The challenge lies in striking a balance between promoting Hindi as the official language and preserving linguistic diversity to ensure inclusive representation.


2. Flexibility in Language Usage:

   - The need for flexibility in language usage, as highlighted in the C.K. Daphtary case, ensures that practical considerations align with constitutional provisions.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a nation with a multitude of languages, Articles 348 to 350 reflect the constitutional vision of fostering linguistic diversity while providing a functional framework for official language usage.


Conclusion:


Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution encapsulate the delicate balance between promoting linguistic diversity and ensuring effective communication. The C.K. Daphtary case has played a significant role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions, acknowledging the need for flexibility in language usage. In the contemporary era, where linguistic inclusivity is a priority, these articles contribute to the democratic ethos of the country.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more