Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution: Official Language of the Republic of India and Bilingual Legislatures

Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution: Official Language of the Republic of India and Bilingual Legislatures



Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution delineate provisions related to the official language of the Republic of India and the use of two languages, Hindi and English, in the proceedings of Parliament and state legislatures. In the contemporary era marked by linguistic diversity and the need for effective communication, these constitutional clauses play a pivotal role in balancing linguistic inclusivity and practical functionality. This article explores the constitutional intricacies, examines relevant case laws, and sheds light on the contemporary relevance of these provisions.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 348: Empowers the President to authorize the use of the Hindi language in addition to English for official purposes of the Union, including proceedings in Parliament.


- Article 349: Relates to the directive to promote the spread of the Hindi language and its enrichment, while safeguarding the features of the languages used in India.


- Article 350: Envisions the provision of facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Articles 348 to 350 symbolize the constitutional commitment to linguistic diversity, providing a nuanced framework for the use of official languages and the promotion of linguistic inclusivity.


Relevant Case Law:


C.K. Daphtary v. O.P. Gupta (1971):


This case emphasized the importance of preserving linguistic diversity while highlighting the need for flexibility in language usage. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of English in courts is permissible to ensure justice, especially in states where English is not the official language.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Official Language of the Union:

   - Article 348 empowers the President to authorize the use of Hindi in addition to English for official purposes, ensuring flexibility and inclusivity.


2. Promotion of Hindi:

   - Article 349 directs the government to promote the spread and enrichment of the Hindi language while safeguarding linguistic diversity.


3. Education in Mother Tongue:

   - Article 350 underscores the importance of providing facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education, particularly for linguistic minority groups.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Linguistic Inclusivity:

   - The challenge lies in striking a balance between promoting Hindi as the official language and preserving linguistic diversity to ensure inclusive representation.


2. Flexibility in Language Usage:

   - The need for flexibility in language usage, as highlighted in the C.K. Daphtary case, ensures that practical considerations align with constitutional provisions.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a nation with a multitude of languages, Articles 348 to 350 reflect the constitutional vision of fostering linguistic diversity while providing a functional framework for official language usage.


Conclusion:


Articles 348 to 350 of the Indian Constitution encapsulate the delicate balance between promoting linguistic diversity and ensuring effective communication. The C.K. Daphtary case has played a significant role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions, acknowledging the need for flexibility in language usage. In the contemporary era, where linguistic inclusivity is a priority, these articles contribute to the democratic ethos of the country.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more