Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution: Regulation of Language in the State Legislatures

Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution: Regulation of Language in the State Legislatures



Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution delineate the provisions regarding the regulation of language in the proceedings of the State Legislatures. In the present era, characterized by linguistic diversity and the imperative for effective communication, these constitutional clauses play a significant role in harmonizing linguistic practices within the legislative framework. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, examines relevant case laws, and elucidates the contemporary relevance of these provisions in the current socio-political milieu.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 345: Empowers the State Legislatures to regulate the use of languages for official purposes within their jurisdiction.


- Article 346: Authorizes the Governor of a state to specify the language or languages to be used for official purposes in the state.


- Article 347: Grants the state legislatures the authority to provide for the continued use of the English language for official purposes, even after a specified period.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political context, Articles 345 to 347 serve as constitutional mechanisms to ensure effective communication in the state legislatures, accommodating linguistic diversity while maintaining the efficiency of legislative proceedings.


Relevant Case Law:


P. Rajagopal Naidu v. State of Orissa (1964):


This case underscored the importance of linguistic freedom in the legislative domain. The Supreme Court emphasized that a member of the state legislature has the right to speak in his mother tongue, and any restriction on the use of a language could be seen as a limitation on the member's freedom of speech.


Interpretation and Application:


1. State Legislature Autonomy:

   - Article 345 grants autonomy to State Legislatures, allowing them to regulate the use of languages for official purposes within their jurisdiction.


2. Governor's Authority:

   - Article 346 vests the Governor with the authority to specify the language or languages for official purposes in the state.


3. Continued Use of English:

   - Article 347 empowers state legislatures to provide for the continued use of the English language for official purposes, even beyond a specified period.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Linguistic Diversity:

   - The challenge lies in balancing linguistic diversity while ensuring effective communication in the legislative domain. Striking this balance is essential for fostering inclusivity.


2. Preserving Freedom of Speech:

   - Upholding the freedom of speech of members of the state legislature, as emphasized in the P. Rajagopal Naidu case, is crucial in ensuring democratic participation.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


Given the linguistic diversity across states, Articles 345 to 347 acknowledge the importance of accommodating various languages for official purposes in the state legislatures, contributing to the democratic ethos of the country.


Conclusion:


Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution embody the constitutional commitment to linguistic diversity within the legislative framework. The P. Rajagopal Naidu case has played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions, emphasizing the significance of linguistic freedom in the state legislatures. In the current era, where effective communication is essential for democratic functioning, these articles strike a delicate balance between linguistic diversity and the practical necessities of legislative proceedings.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more