Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution: Regulation of Language in the State Legislatures

Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution: Regulation of Language in the State Legislatures



Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution delineate the provisions regarding the regulation of language in the proceedings of the State Legislatures. In the present era, characterized by linguistic diversity and the imperative for effective communication, these constitutional clauses play a significant role in harmonizing linguistic practices within the legislative framework. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, examines relevant case laws, and elucidates the contemporary relevance of these provisions in the current socio-political milieu.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 345: Empowers the State Legislatures to regulate the use of languages for official purposes within their jurisdiction.


- Article 346: Authorizes the Governor of a state to specify the language or languages to be used for official purposes in the state.


- Article 347: Grants the state legislatures the authority to provide for the continued use of the English language for official purposes, even after a specified period.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political context, Articles 345 to 347 serve as constitutional mechanisms to ensure effective communication in the state legislatures, accommodating linguistic diversity while maintaining the efficiency of legislative proceedings.


Relevant Case Law:


P. Rajagopal Naidu v. State of Orissa (1964):


This case underscored the importance of linguistic freedom in the legislative domain. The Supreme Court emphasized that a member of the state legislature has the right to speak in his mother tongue, and any restriction on the use of a language could be seen as a limitation on the member's freedom of speech.


Interpretation and Application:


1. State Legislature Autonomy:

   - Article 345 grants autonomy to State Legislatures, allowing them to regulate the use of languages for official purposes within their jurisdiction.


2. Governor's Authority:

   - Article 346 vests the Governor with the authority to specify the language or languages for official purposes in the state.


3. Continued Use of English:

   - Article 347 empowers state legislatures to provide for the continued use of the English language for official purposes, even beyond a specified period.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Balancing Linguistic Diversity:

   - The challenge lies in balancing linguistic diversity while ensuring effective communication in the legislative domain. Striking this balance is essential for fostering inclusivity.


2. Preserving Freedom of Speech:

   - Upholding the freedom of speech of members of the state legislature, as emphasized in the P. Rajagopal Naidu case, is crucial in ensuring democratic participation.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


Given the linguistic diversity across states, Articles 345 to 347 acknowledge the importance of accommodating various languages for official purposes in the state legislatures, contributing to the democratic ethos of the country.


Conclusion:


Articles 345 to 347 of the Indian Constitution embody the constitutional commitment to linguistic diversity within the legislative framework. The P. Rajagopal Naidu case has played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of these provisions, emphasizing the significance of linguistic freedom in the state legislatures. In the current era, where effective communication is essential for democratic functioning, these articles strike a delicate balance between linguistic diversity and the practical necessities of legislative proceedings.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more