Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...

Article 371 of the Indian Constitution: Regional Special Provisions in the Modern Context

Article 371 of the Indian Constitution: Regional Special Provisions in the Modern Context



Article 371 of the Indian Constitution carves out special provisions for certain states and regions, recognizing the unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts they inhabit. As India progresses into the modern era, it becomes imperative to examine the relevance and impact of Article 371. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding this article in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371: Enumerates special provisions for various states and regions, addressing matters such as governance, administration, and resource allocation.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Article 371 continues to play a significant role in maintaining a delicate balance between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution.


Relevant Case Laws:


Rameshwar Prasad and Others v. Union of India (2006):


This case dealt with the interpretation of Article 371 and its applicability to Bihar. The Supreme Court affirmed the significance of Article 371, emphasizing that it is not merely a temporary provision but a special arrangement recognizing the unique features of certain states.


Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974):


While not directly related to Article 371, this case emphasized the need to harmonize special provisions with the broader constitutional framework. It underscored the principle that special provisions should not undermine the basic structure of the Constitution.


Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar (1996):


This case addressed issues related to land reforms in Bihar, considering the special provisions under Article 371. The Supreme Court held that while special provisions are meant to protect the interests of certain regions, they should not be a shield for perpetuating outdated practices.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Special Provisions for Governance:

   - Article 371 grants special provisions for governance in various states, allowing for specific arrangements related to legislative power, local customs, and traditions.


2. Protection of Local Interests:

   - Article 371 seeks to protect the interests of various regions by ensuring that certain laws and regulations do not apply uniformly but are adapted to the specific needs of the region.


3. Resource Allocation:

   - Some versions of Article 371 also address issues related to resource allocation, recognizing the need for equitable distribution while respecting the unique circumstances of different states.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Harmonizing Regional Autonomy with Constitutional Principles:

   - The challenge is to strike a balance between preserving regional autonomy, as envisaged in Article 371, and upholding the fundamental principles of equality and justice enshrined in the broader constitutional framework.


2. Ensuring Modernization and Development:

   - Special provisions should not impede the modernization and development of regions. There is a challenge in ensuring that these provisions, while protecting local interests, do not become obstacles to progress.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a rapidly changing world, Article 371 reflects the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Article 371 of the Indian Constitution represents a nuanced approach to governance, recognizing the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as Rameshwar Prasad and Others v. Union of India and Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of this provision. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Article 371 remains an essential element in India's constitutional journey.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Equality Before Law