Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Article 371 of the Indian Constitution: Regional Special Provisions in the Modern Context

Article 371 of the Indian Constitution: Regional Special Provisions in the Modern Context



Article 371 of the Indian Constitution carves out special provisions for certain states and regions, recognizing the unique historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts they inhabit. As India progresses into the modern era, it becomes imperative to examine the relevance and impact of Article 371. This article delves into the constitutional intricacies, explores relevant case laws, and sheds light on the dynamics surrounding this article in the contemporary socio-political landscape.


Constitutional Provisions:


- Article 371: Enumerates special provisions for various states and regions, addressing matters such as governance, administration, and resource allocation.


Contemporary Significance:


In the present socio-political landscape, Article 371 continues to play a significant role in maintaining a delicate balance between regional autonomy and the overarching principles of the Indian Constitution.


Relevant Case Laws:


Rameshwar Prasad and Others v. Union of India (2006):


This case dealt with the interpretation of Article 371 and its applicability to Bihar. The Supreme Court affirmed the significance of Article 371, emphasizing that it is not merely a temporary provision but a special arrangement recognizing the unique features of certain states.


Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974):


While not directly related to Article 371, this case emphasized the need to harmonize special provisions with the broader constitutional framework. It underscored the principle that special provisions should not undermine the basic structure of the Constitution.


Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar (1996):


This case addressed issues related to land reforms in Bihar, considering the special provisions under Article 371. The Supreme Court held that while special provisions are meant to protect the interests of certain regions, they should not be a shield for perpetuating outdated practices.


Interpretation and Application:


1. Special Provisions for Governance:

   - Article 371 grants special provisions for governance in various states, allowing for specific arrangements related to legislative power, local customs, and traditions.


2. Protection of Local Interests:

   - Article 371 seeks to protect the interests of various regions by ensuring that certain laws and regulations do not apply uniformly but are adapted to the specific needs of the region.


3. Resource Allocation:

   - Some versions of Article 371 also address issues related to resource allocation, recognizing the need for equitable distribution while respecting the unique circumstances of different states.


Challenges and Solutions:


1. Harmonizing Regional Autonomy with Constitutional Principles:

   - The challenge is to strike a balance between preserving regional autonomy, as envisaged in Article 371, and upholding the fundamental principles of equality and justice enshrined in the broader constitutional framework.


2. Ensuring Modernization and Development:

   - Special provisions should not impede the modernization and development of regions. There is a challenge in ensuring that these provisions, while protecting local interests, do not become obstacles to progress.


Contemporary Socio-Political Dynamics:


In a rapidly changing world, Article 371 reflects the constitutional foresight in addressing the complexities of governance, recognizing unique historical contexts, and accommodating regional considerations within the broader framework of a unified nation.


Conclusion:


Article 371 of the Indian Constitution represents a nuanced approach to governance, recognizing the diverse needs and historical backgrounds of different regions. The relevant case laws, such as Rameshwar Prasad and Others v. Union of India and Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar, have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of this provision. In the contemporary era, where the constitutional landscape must evolve without compromising its foundational principles, Article 371 remains an essential element in India's constitutional journey.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more