Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Rajya Sabha Dynamics: Articles 188-189 and Legislative Composition in India

Rajya Sabha Dynamics: Articles 188-189 and Legislative Composition in India





Overview:
Articles 188 to 189 outline the structure, qualifications, and term of office for members of the Rajya Sabha, contributing significantly to the composition and functionality of the upper house of Parliament.

Article 188: Composition of Rajya Sabha

Article 188 specifies the composition of the Rajya Sabha, representing states and Union territories, and determines the allocation of seats.

Article 189: Qualifications for Membership

Article 189 addresses the qualifications required for individuals to become members of the Rajya Sabha, outlining the eligibility criteria.

Significance and Interpretation:

While not extensively supported by numerous case laws specific to each article, Articles 188 to 189 hold critical importance in defining the composition and eligibility criteria for Rajya Sabha members, aligning with constitutional principles.

Representation of States:
These articles ensure proportional representation of states and Union territories in the Rajya Sabha, reflecting the federal character of the Indian Constitution.

Qualifications for Membership:
The articles set the qualifications for individuals seeking membership in the Rajya Sabha, ensuring they meet specific criteria.

Relevant Instances and Constitutional Principles:

Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006):
Though not directly tied to Articles 188-189, this case highlighted discussions on the qualifications and eligibility criteria of members seeking Rajya Sabha membership.

Representation and Federalism:
Instances of debates on proportional representation, especially concerning states' populations and interests, shape discussions on the Rajya Sabha's composition.

Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:

In the contemporary landscape, Articles 188 to 189 face challenges related to representing diverse state interests, addressing eligibility criteria, and ensuring effective functioning of the Rajya Sabha.

State Representation:
Ensuring equitable representation for states of varying populations and interests remains a contemporary challenge for the Rajya Sabha.

Membership Criteria:
Adapting membership criteria to contemporary needs, while maintaining constitutional principles, poses challenges in accommodating evolving societal dynamics.

Conclusion:

Articles 188 to 189 of the Indian Constitution delineate the structure, representation, and eligibility criteria for the Rajya Sabha, contributing significantly to its composition and functionality. While not heavily supported by numerous case laws specific to each article, these provisions play a pivotal role in upholding federal principles and defining eligibility criteria for members. As India progresses in governance, ensuring equitable representation, adapting membership criteria, and addressing challenges related to the effective functioning of the Rajya Sabha remain crucial for upholding the integrity of the upper house within the constitutional framework.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law