Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Rajya Sabha Dynamics: Articles 188-189 and Legislative Composition in India

Rajya Sabha Dynamics: Articles 188-189 and Legislative Composition in India





Overview:
Articles 188 to 189 outline the structure, qualifications, and term of office for members of the Rajya Sabha, contributing significantly to the composition and functionality of the upper house of Parliament.

Article 188: Composition of Rajya Sabha

Article 188 specifies the composition of the Rajya Sabha, representing states and Union territories, and determines the allocation of seats.

Article 189: Qualifications for Membership

Article 189 addresses the qualifications required for individuals to become members of the Rajya Sabha, outlining the eligibility criteria.

Significance and Interpretation:

While not extensively supported by numerous case laws specific to each article, Articles 188 to 189 hold critical importance in defining the composition and eligibility criteria for Rajya Sabha members, aligning with constitutional principles.

Representation of States:
These articles ensure proportional representation of states and Union territories in the Rajya Sabha, reflecting the federal character of the Indian Constitution.

Qualifications for Membership:
The articles set the qualifications for individuals seeking membership in the Rajya Sabha, ensuring they meet specific criteria.

Relevant Instances and Constitutional Principles:

Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006):
Though not directly tied to Articles 188-189, this case highlighted discussions on the qualifications and eligibility criteria of members seeking Rajya Sabha membership.

Representation and Federalism:
Instances of debates on proportional representation, especially concerning states' populations and interests, shape discussions on the Rajya Sabha's composition.

Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:

In the contemporary landscape, Articles 188 to 189 face challenges related to representing diverse state interests, addressing eligibility criteria, and ensuring effective functioning of the Rajya Sabha.

State Representation:
Ensuring equitable representation for states of varying populations and interests remains a contemporary challenge for the Rajya Sabha.

Membership Criteria:
Adapting membership criteria to contemporary needs, while maintaining constitutional principles, poses challenges in accommodating evolving societal dynamics.

Conclusion:

Articles 188 to 189 of the Indian Constitution delineate the structure, representation, and eligibility criteria for the Rajya Sabha, contributing significantly to its composition and functionality. While not heavily supported by numerous case laws specific to each article, these provisions play a pivotal role in upholding federal principles and defining eligibility criteria for members. As India progresses in governance, ensuring equitable representation, adapting membership criteria, and addressing challenges related to the effective functioning of the Rajya Sabha remain crucial for upholding the integrity of the upper house within the constitutional framework.
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more